The UK's Number One VoIP Resource
This is a discussion on Need SPI support in router? within the uk.telecom.voip forums, part of the Newsgroup Forums category; Graham Murray wrote:[color=blue] > Mark McIntyre <markmcintyre@spamcop.net> writes: >[color=green] >> Graham ...
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
Graham Murray wrote:[color=blue]
> Mark McIntyre <markmcintyre@spamcop.net> writes: >[color=green] >> Graham Murray wrote:[color=darkred] >>> "Gaz" <gazter@msn.com> writes: >>> >>>> SPI is to do with internet packet inspection, is it not??? >>> Google would seem to indicate otherwise. The first hit on the query >>> 'SPI' returns the Wikipedia article for 'Serial Peripheral Interface'[/color] >> >> Good example of why not to rely on websearches alone. SPI with respect >> to firewalls is Stateful Packet Inspection.[/color] > > Yet the original post did not mention firewalls, it mentioned > routers.[/color] As far as consumers are concerned, routers *are* firewalls. It is after all one of their chief selling points. Indeed I doubt you'll find a single router advert or marketing blurb that doesn't mention its firewall capabilities. Plus it was clear from the context that he was asking about selling points of routers. I can't concieve of the serial interface being a selling point, whereas stateful packet inspection is very often listed as a feature. [color=blue] > It is perfectly conceivable that a router might use an SPI bus > as a data highway between 2 or more of its chips.[/color] It is, but I think you're digging a deeper hole! :-) |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|