UKVoIPTalk.com

On Tue, 1 Jan 2008 09:41:06 +0000 (UTC), [email]ifefm@gmail.com[/email] wrote:
[color=blue]
>-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=
>-= Capital. Radio - Chris Tarrant -=
>-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=
>
>Capital Radio DJs have been "in on it" from. the start. One of the first
>things I heard in the summer of 1990 was. from a Capital DJ who said, "If
>he listens to Capital then he can't be. all bad" (supportive, you see. We're
>not bastards). Much of what came over the radio. in 1990 is now so far away
>the precise details have been. obliterated by time. No diary was kept of the
>details, and. although archives if they exist may give pointers, the
>ambiguity of what broadcasters said would. leave that open to
>re-interpretation.
>
>In spring 1994, Chris Tarrant on his Capital morning show made an aside. to
>someone else in the studio, about a person he didn't identify.. He said,
>"You know this bloke? He says we're trying to kill. him. We should be done
>for. attempted manslaughter".
>
>That. mirrored something I had said a day or two before. What Tarrant said
>was understood by. the staff member in the studio he was saying it to; they
>said, "Oh no, don't say that". to Tarrant. If any archives exist of the
>morning show (probably unlikely) then it could be found. there; what he said
>was so. out of context that he would be very hard put to find an explanation.
>A couple of days later, someone at. the site where I was working repeated the
>remark although in a different. way; they said there had been people in a
>computer. room when automatic fire extinguishers went off and those people
>were "thinking. of suing for attempted manslaughter".
>
>Finally, this isn't confined to the established radio stations.. In 1990
>after I had listened to a pirate radio station in. South London for about
>half. an hour, there was an audible phone call in the background, followed
>by total silence for a few moments,. then shrieks of laughter. "So what are
>we supposed to. say now? Deadly torture? He's going to talk to us now, isn't
>he?",. which meant that they could hear what I would say in my room.
>
>7243[/color]

Oh dear spammers at it again call Ivor quickly and get him to come
here and have a rant at them again .

You seem to be doing a good job of it by yourself. Besides, that isn't spam. Crap, yes, but not spam. What are they trying to sell?

KF

Anonymous Sender wrote:
<Snipped spam>

[color=blue]
> Oh dear spammers at it again call Ivor quickly and get him to come
> here and have a rant at them again .
>
> You seem to be doing a good job of it by yourself. Besides, that isn't spam. Crap, yes, but not spam. What are they trying to sell?
>
> KF[/color]

And of course the pair of you dullards are quoting the spam to help
perpetuate it........

"Desk Rabbit" <nospam@example.com> wrote in message
news:v5idnSgZPZsAzubanZ2dnUVZ8tvinZ2d@pipex.net...[color=blue]
> Anonymous Sender wrote:
> <Snipped spam>
>
>[color=green]
>> Oh dear spammers at it again call Ivor quickly and get him to come
>> here and have a rant at them again .
>>
>> You seem to be doing a good job of it by yourself. Besides, that isn't
>> spam. Crap, yes, but not spam. What are they trying to sell?
>>
>> KF[/color]
>
> And of course the pair of you dullards are quoting the spam to help
> perpetuate it........[/color]

I use OE for mail and newsgroups and this "MI5" stuff is doing my head in.
Has anyone got an effective way of filtering it out? The "From" address
changes constantly so the normal Block Sender is ineffective.

I wish MI5 would just send the boys round and finish him off!