The UK's Number One VoIP Resource
This is a discussion on Ron Chew - BANNED from voip.co.uk forum within the uk.telecom.voip forums, part of the Newsgroup Forums category; As title. Now if only we could get rid of him from here as well :-(...
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
"Al Paca" <Al-Paca@lostsomewhereinperu.com> wrote in message news:3358m3pedal22osqbpeqk5bcbgnkgh1mli@news.individual.de...[color=blue] > As title. > > Now if only we could get rid of him from here as well :-( >[/color] You can do, just put him in your blocked senders list, and if he changes his identity, just add the new identity to the list, it only takes a couple of seconds. Unfortunately, I have had to put Ivor in as well, because he kept replying to him, and included Ron's rantings in his replies, but since doing that, I very very rarely see any of Ron's rubbish now, and the group seems much better for it. |
|
|||
|
"Harry Stottle" <sorryspamdoesntwork@nospam.uk.co> wrote in message news:iPU8j.9435$h35.2705@newsfe2-gui.ntli.net...[color=blue] > > "Al Paca" <Al-Paca@lostsomewhereinperu.com> wrote in message > news:3358m3pedal22osqbpeqk5bcbgnkgh1mli@news.individual.de...[color=green] >> As title. >> >> Now if only we could get rid of him from here as well :-( >>[/color] > You can do, just put him in your blocked senders list, and if he changes > his identity, just add the new identity to the list, it only takes a > couple of seconds. Unfortunately, I have had to put Ivor in as well, > because he kept replying to him, and included Ron's rantings in his > replies, but since doing that, I very very rarely see any of Ron's rubbish > now, and the group seems much better for it. >[/color] Yes, an old problem. We have two very nasty individuals on aus.electronics. Of course, I put them in my blocked list but others will keep replying and quoting them in full, and thus their nastiness still invades my desktop. I grumbled about this only to be told "who are you to censor?". Fair point I suppose but sigh... |
|
|||
|
Harry Stottle wrote:[color=blue]
> "Al Paca" <Al-Paca@lostsomewhereinperu.com> wrote in message > news:3358m3pedal22osqbpeqk5bcbgnkgh1mli@news.individual.de...[color=green] >> As title. >> >> Now if only we could get rid of him from here as well :-( >>[/color] > You can do, just put him in your blocked senders list, and if he > changes his identity, just add the new identity to the list, it only > takes a couple of seconds. Unfortunately, I have had to put Ivor in > as well, because he kept replying to him, and included Ron's rantings > in his replies, but since doing that, I very very rarely see any of > Ron's rubbish now, and the group seems much better for it.[/color] Same here, they are both blocked, and as you say, this place is so much better for it. -- Worried about debt? [url]http://www.cccs.co.uk[/url] |
|
|||
|
On Sat, 15 Dec 2007 18:13:34 GMT, "Harry Stottle"
<sorryspamdoesntwork@nospam.uk.co> wrote: [color=blue] >You can do, just put him in your blocked senders list, and if he changes >his identity, just add the new identity to the list, it only takes a >couple of seconds.[/color] I've already done this and it's fine in theory but falls down for two reasons. 1) People keep replying to him instead of ignoring the drivel, and 2) People keep quoting large blocks or entire messages of his. If we could train ourselves not to do this the group could get on with it's original charter purpose. |
|
|||
|
On Sat, 15 Dec 2007 17:53:25 +0000, Al Paca
<Al-Paca@lostsomewhereinperu.com> wrote: [color=blue] >As title. > >Now if only we could get rid of him from here as well :-( >[/color] Get your facts right before you post total nonsense PILLOCK I was in the forum less than a hour ago . |
|
|||
|
"{{{{{Welcome}}}}}" <bhx_spam@trapped__hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message news:MhW8j.63437$c_1.57046@text.news.blueyonder.co.uk...[color=blue] > -- > Worried about debt? > [url]http://www.cccs.co.uk[/url][/color] Not wishing this to appear as spamming, and it's OT, but picking up on your sig, another very useful site for those having problems with credit card debt and similar is [url]http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk[/url] or more specifcally [url]http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt/[/url] where you will find many people challenging the legality of the enforcement of their debts by various creditors and Debt Collection Agencies, and winning! Rob |
|
|||
|
On Sun, 16 Dec 2007 18:48:52 GMT, [email]mymail@hotmail.com[/email] wrote:
[color=blue] >Get your facts right before you post total nonsense PILLOCK[/color] 'Sticks and stones' Anyone can read it Ronnie boy, but you have been banned from posting there due to your unnecessary abusive inaccurate attacks on the company. My facts are without doubt. |
|
|||
|
"Al Paca" <Al-Paca@lostsomewhereinperu.com> wrote in message news:skbcm3hb023l1af4ujobnjrncb47n8ec68@news.individual.de...[color=blue] > On Sun, 16 Dec 2007 18:48:52 GMT, [email]mymail@hotmail.com[/email] wrote: >[color=green] >>Get your facts right before you post total nonsense PILLOCK[/color] > > 'Sticks and stones' > > Anyone can read it Ronnie boy, but you have been banned from posting > there due to your unnecessary abusive inaccurate attacks on the > company. > > My facts are without doubt. >[/color] This thread is getting boring. Haven't you all got something better to do? |
|
|||
|
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 20:34:52 +1100, "Suzy" <not@valid> wrote:
[color=blue] > >"Al Paca" <Al-Paca@lostsomewhereinperu.com> wrote in message >news:skbcm3hb023l1af4ujobnjrncb47n8ec68@news.individual.de...[color=green] >> On Sun, 16 Dec 2007 18:48:52 GMT, [email]mymail@hotmail.com[/email] wrote: >>[color=darkred] >>>Get your facts right before you post total nonsense PILLOCK[/color] >> >> 'Sticks and stones' >> >> Anyone can read it Ronnie boy, but you have been banned from posting >> there due to your unnecessary abusive inaccurate attacks on the >> company. >> >> My facts are without doubt. >>[/color] >This thread is getting boring. Haven't you all got something better to do? >[/color] Course we have I have resolved to give and get voip.co.uk as much bad publicity has I can they are a lying shower of bastards and also place one particular contributor in my KF because it doesn't know what it is talking about and tells untruths .Hell I thought Sipgate was bad but the shower at uk voip make Sipgate look almost decent . |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|