UKVoIPTalk.com

"Harry Stottle" <sorryspamdoesntwork@nospam.uk.co> wrote in
message news:r7I4j.1302$zw.196@newsfe3-win.ntli.net
: : "Ivor Jones" <ivor@despammed.invalid> wrote in message
: : news:5rgta7F14m65oU2@mid.individual.net...
: : :
: : :
: : : I retaliate because to do anything else would give
: : : him the victory.
: :
: : Not true, you give him victory by replying to him as
: : this is what he wants you to do. He has openly stated
: : in the past that he wants to ruin this group, and sees
: : you as a means to help him do that, which you seem
: : happy to help him try and do.

No. If I do not reply in defence, others will see and maybe even believe
what he writes.

I will not allow someone to accuse me of something that isn't true without
speaking in my defence.

I am sorry you cannot understand this, but he is the *only* one who can
stop the current state of affairs. As I have said before to others,
address your complaints to him.


Ivor

Problem solved - I put both of them on my blocked senders list.

Harry Stottle wrote:[color=blue]
> "Ivor Jones" <ivor@despammed.invalid> wrote in message
> news:5rgta7F14m65oU2@mid.individual.net...[color=green]
>>
>> I retaliate because to do anything else would give him the victory.[/color]
>
> Not true, you give him victory by replying to him as this is what he
> wants you to do. He has openly stated in the past that he wants to ruin
> this group, and sees you as a means to help him do that, which you seem
> happy to help him try and do. The only time I see his posts is when you
> reply to them, and I suspect this is the case with many others here. If
> you want victory over him, just put him in your blocked senders list,
> this upset him more than anything else you can do, or say, which has
> been proved many times by him having to change his identity to try and
> get people to react, but his posts are easily recognisable, so it is
> easy to blank him every time he does this. Just do it, then you won't
> know what he is writing about, and nobody else will, he will disappear
> forever, and this group will be back to how it used to be, helpful and
> informative.
>
>[/color]

"Eric" <Eric@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:t9mdnRFtXJYALs7anZ2dnUVZ8qugnZ2d@eclipse.net.uk...
[color=blue]
> Problem solved - I put both of them on my blocked senders list.[/color]

I did that reluctantly some time ago. Unfortunately, it hasn't solved the
problem. Some people reply to them, quoting their posts in full.

The only way to completely solve this for those of us who don't need the
hassle would be to leave the group altogether. Unless hell freezes over and
Ivor realises he's being given excellent advice.

"Ivor Jones" <ivor@despammed.invalid> wrote in message
news:5rh261F14lnrjU1@mid.individual.net...[color=blue]
>
> I am sorry you cannot understand this, but he is the *only* one who
> can stop the current state of affairs. As I have said before to
> others, address your complaints to him.
>[/color]
And why do you think nobody bothers to addresses their 'complaints' to
him?
Most people on here don't read his posts, (unless you reply to them),
and they know that if they tried to reason with him, it would just
encourage him to write more drivel, trying to justify his previous
drivel, so the only way to get rid of him is to ignore him. He must be
laughing his head off every time he reads someone has added you to their
blocked senders list, which he will see as a victory against you because
he hates it when people do it to him, so wake up and follow the advice,
(not complaints), you have been given.

"Harry Stottle" <sorryspamdoesntwork@nospam.uk.co> wrote in
message news:ZQQ4j.423$ov2.266@newsfe5-win.ntli.net
: : "Ivor Jones" <ivor@despammed.invalid> wrote in message
: : news:5rh261F14lnrjU1@mid.individual.net...
: : :
: : : I am sorry you cannot understand this, but he is the
: : : *only* one who can stop the current state of affairs.
: : : As I have said before to others, address your
: : : complaints to him.
: : :
: : And why do you think nobody bothers to addresses their
: : 'complaints' to him?

I don't know or care. Do so or put up with things as they are.

: : Most people on here don't read his posts, (unless you
: : reply to them), and they know that if they tried to
: : reason with him, it would just encourage him to write
: : more drivel, trying to justify his previous drivel, so
: : the only way to get rid of him is to ignore him. He
: : must be laughing his head off every time he reads
: : someone has added you to their blocked senders list,
: : which he will see as a victory against you because he
: : hates it when people do it to him, so wake up and
: : follow the advice, (not complaints), you have been
: : given.

No. He is the only one who can stop this.

Ivor

"cybuerke" <cybuerke@PLMgooglemailmail.com> wrote in
message news:fj0itq$j0e$1@energise.enta.net
: : "Eric" <Eric@nospam.com> wrote in message
: : news:t9mdnRFtXJYALs7anZ2dnUVZ8qugnZ2d@eclipse.net.uk...
: :
: : : Problem solved - I put both of them on my blocked
: : : senders list.
: :
: : I did that reluctantly some time ago. Unfortunately,
: : it hasn't solved the problem. Some people reply to
: : them, quoting their posts in full.
: :
: : The only way to completely solve this for those of us
: : who don't need the hassle would be to leave the group
: : altogether. Unless hell freezes over and Ivor realises
: : he's being given excellent advice.

Give Ron the advice, he's the only one who can do anything about it.

Ivor

On Sun, 2 Dec 2007 23:26:59 -0000, "Ivor Jones"
<ivor@despammed.invalid> wrote:

[color=blue]
>I retaliate because to do anything else would give him the victory. That I
>will never do while there is breath in my body.[/color]
In that case you know what to do Ivor take steps to make sure no more
breath gets into your body and the sooner the better .

"Ivor Jones" <ivor@despammed.invalid> wrote in message
news:5ri5jaF14vhumU1@mid.individual.net...[color=blue]
>
>
> "Harry Stottle" <sorryspamdoesntwork@nospam.uk.co> wrote in
> message news:ZQQ4j.423$ov2.266@newsfe5-win.ntli.net : : "Ivor Jones"
> <ivor@despammed.invalid> wrote in message
> : : news:5rh261F14lnrjU1@mid.individual.net...
> : : : : : : I am sorry you cannot understand this, but he is the
> : : : *only* one who can stop the current state of affairs.
> : : : As I have said before to others, address your
> : : : complaints to him. : : : : : And why do you think nobody bothers
> to addresses their
> : : 'complaints' to him?
>
> I don't know or care. Do so or put up with things as they are.
>
> : : Most people on here don't read his posts, (unless you
> : : reply to them), and they know that if they tried to
> : : reason with him, it would just encourage him to write
> : : more drivel, trying to justify his previous drivel, so
> : : the only way to get rid of him is to ignore him. He
> : : must be laughing his head off every time he reads
> : : someone has added you to their blocked senders list,
> : : which he will see as a victory against you because he
> : : hates it when people do it to him, so wake up and
> : : follow the advice, (not complaints), you have been
> : : given.
> No. He is the only one who can stop this.
>[/color]
No he isn't, and after trying several times to offer you what I consider
to be good advice, I have reluctantly taken steps to stop it by myself,
so as far as I am concerned, continue your petty argument, I shall not
be following it.

On Mon, 03 Dec 2007 00:31:19 GMT, "Harry Stottle"
<sorryspamdoesntwork@nospam.uk.co> wrote:

[color=blue]
>Not true, you give him victory by replying to him as this is what he
>wants you to do. He has openly stated in the past that he wants to ruin
>this group,[/color]
No I don't you are totally wrong I just want that pillock out of here
and the sooner the better.[color=blue]
> The only time I see his posts is when you
>reply to them, and I suspect this is the case with many others here.[/color]
I have said many times over the passed few weeks there wasn't any of
this nonsense when HE was away for a few days recently and I was here
there was no need for any nonsense because HE wasn't continually
posting his crap about spammers and Sipgate every time he touched his
keyboard .

Gee - what a long thread of pure bickering...