The UK's Number One VoIP Resource
This is a discussion on More than one ATA? within the uk.telecom.voip forums, part of the Newsgroup Forums category; Ivor Jones wrote: [color=blue] > "Michael" <kj@nvb.com> wrote in message > news:wq6Hi....
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
Ivor Jones wrote:
[color=blue] > "Michael" <kj@nvb.com> wrote in message > news:wq6Hi.37105$mZ5.8949@newsfe6-win.ntli.net > : : Folks > : : > : : I currently run a Sipura SPA1001 ATA through a Belkin > : : wireless router. > : : > : : Is there any reason why I could not run an additional > : : ATA (probably another SPA1001) through a spare Ethernet > : : port on that router to allow a someone else to run > : : their own phone line (my daughter ..... she can take it > : : with her when she leaves home to go to Uni). > > No problem at all, I have about three hanging off a Fritz!Box here > (Which has 6 accounts all by itself..!) > > Make sure you assign fixed IP addresses to them though, DHCP causes > problems. > > > Ivor[/color] Thanks folks - looks good. Certainly, when I set up my Sipura ATA SPA1001 - apart from get the bits right like regional settings etc (with help from this forum) I didn't have to do anything else other than make sure the Router was set as per instructions.... nothing difficult. Running a second ATA should be the same I assume - and if I had any local difficulties, no doubt members of this forum would assist as always! All I need now is a good price for another SPA 1001 Thanks again Mick -- |
|
|||
|
Tim wrote:[color=blue]
> Jono wrote:[color=green] >> Michael has brought this to us :[color=darkred] >>> Folks >>> >>> I currently run a Sipura SPA1001 ATA through a Belkin wireless >>> router. Is there any reason why I could not run an additional ATA >>> (probably >>> another SPA1001) through a spare Ethernet port on that router to >>> allow a someone else to run their own phone line (my daughter ..... >>> she can take it with her when she leaves home to go to Uni).[/color][/color] > > It should work fine. >[color=green] >> >> Port forwarding issues? >>[/color] > > There is honestly no need to forward ports for any SIP device > nowadays. Any SIP provider with even half a brain will cope fine > with devices behind a NAT. > > I've been using SIP devices for 5 years now. I certainly haven't put > in a single port forwarding for SIP in the last 3 years. It just > isn't necessary anymore. > > > > Tim[/color] Yeah, my PAP2 is on my NAT router without any ports being forwarded, no problems at all. -- Items for sale: [url]http://www.dodgy-dealer.co.uk[/url] [url]http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/MetricNow[/url] [url]http://ec.europa.eu/consumers/dyna/rapex/rapex_archives_en.cfm[/url] |
|
|||
|
Ivor Jones wrote:
[color=blue] > "Michael" <kj@nvb.com> wrote in message > news:wq6Hi.37105$mZ5.8949@newsfe6-win.ntli.net > : : Folks > : : > : : I currently run a Sipura SPA1001 ATA through a Belkin > : : wireless router. > : : > : : Is there any reason why I could not run an additional > : : ATA (probably another SPA1001) through a spare Ethernet > : : port on that router to allow a someone else to run > : : their own phone line (my daughter ..... she can take it > : : with her when she leaves home to go to Uni). > > No problem at all, I have about three hanging off a Fritz!Box here > (Which has 6 accounts all by itself..!) > > Make sure you assign fixed IP addresses to them though, DHCP causes > problems. > > > Ivor[/color] Having looked into this now, I could probably upgrade the SPA1001 to a PAP2 and achieve the same result but only taking up 1 port on the router and one point on the trailing 240v socket. Would that make sense? (I could always give daughter the SPA1001 when she goes to Uni) Mick -- |
|
|||
|
Michael wrote:
[color=blue] > Ivor Jones wrote: >[color=green] > > "Michael" <kj@nvb.com> wrote in message > > news:wq6Hi.37105$mZ5.8949@newsfe6-win.ntli.net > > : : Folks > > : : > > : : I currently run a Sipura SPA1001 ATA through a Belkin > > : : wireless router. > > : : > > : : Is there any reason why I could not run an additional > > : : ATA (probably another SPA1001) through a spare Ethernet > > : : port on that router to allow a someone else to run > > : : their own phone line (my daughter ..... she can take it > > : : with her when she leaves home to go to Uni). > > > > No problem at all, I have about three hanging off a Fritz!Box here > > (Which has 6 accounts all by itself..!) > > > > Make sure you assign fixed IP addresses to them though, DHCP causes > > problems. > > > > > > Ivor[/color] > > Having looked into this now, I could probably upgrade the SPA1001 to a > PAP2 and achieve the same result but only taking up 1 port on the > router and one point on the trailing 240v socket. > > Would that make sense? > > (I could always give daughter the SPA1001 when she goes to Uni) > > Mick[/color] Just a thought (sorry about the multi posts) ..... the SPA1001 isn't locked to any provider - is the PAP2 the same - unlocked? Mick -- |
|
|||
|
Michael wrote:[color=blue]
> Just a thought (sorry about the multi posts) ..... the SPA1001 isn't > locked to any provider - is the PAP2 the same - unlocked? >[/color] It depends where you buy them from. [url]http://www.provoip.co.uk/[/url] is always unlocked, as are others. Tim |
|
|||
|
"Tim" <nutnews@kooky.org> wrote in message news:46ed4eb2$0$767$bed64819@news.gradwell.net...[color=blue] > Jono wrote:[color=green] >> Michael has brought this to us :[color=darkred] >>> Folks >>> >>> I currently run a Sipura SPA1001 ATA through a Belkin wireless >>> router. >>> >>> Is there any reason why I could not run an additional ATA >>> (probably >>> another SPA1001) through a spare Ethernet port on that router to >>> allow >>> a someone else to run their own phone line (my daughter ..... she >>> can >>> take it with her when she leaves home to go to Uni).[/color][/color] > > It should work fine. >[color=green] >> >> Port forwarding issues? >>[/color] > > There is honestly no need to forward ports for any SIP device > nowadays. Any SIP provider with even half a brain will cope fine > with devices behind a NAT. > > I've been using SIP devices for 5 years now. I certainly haven't > put in a single port forwarding for SIP in the last 3 years. It > just isn't necessary anymore. > > > > Tim >[/color] Curious that. No way could I get voip.co.uk to work through a Belkin wireless router using a wired port. The preconfigured Xlite softfone from Sipgate would receive incoming calls but I could never make outgoing. Changed to a Netgear 614 and set up port forwarding and all now works a treat, even with a SPA2000 or SPA2102. -- Woody harrogate3 at ntlworld dot com |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|