The UK's Number One VoIP Resource
This is a discussion on Re: The continuing mystery of my shakey connection... within the uk.telecom.voip forums, part of the Newsgroup Forums category; "JakeD" <JakeD@jdjdjvvdjdjdj.com> wrote in message news:gvmqe3hj5sph6jlt3n8pc6gpl23nk4t1ru@4ax.com...[color=blue] > On Sun, ...
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
"JakeD" <JakeD@jdjdjvvdjdjdj.com> wrote in message news:gvmqe3hj5sph6jlt3n8pc6gpl23nk4t1ru@4ax.com...[color=blue] > On Sun, 16 Sep 2007 17:10:40 +0100, JakeD <JakeD@jdjdjvvdjdjdj.com> > wrote: >[color=green] >>PS. Today, during one of the breaks in my bradband connection, I >>disconnected the loud bell from the BT master socket. This made no >>difference; I still could not conect to the net. >> >>When the new master socket arrives, I'll try replacing the face plate.[/color] > > PPS > During a period of OK-connection, with my adsl filter plugged into the > hidden socket behind the master socket's face plate, I did a speed > test today, at: > > [url]http://www.speedtest.bbmax.co.uk/[/url] > > The results were: > 971 kbps download speed > 243 kbps upload speed > > Does this indicate anything? > > Thanks, > > Jake D >[/color] Hi Jake, I have been mulling on this. I think we are pretty much at where we had got to with all this. Shortly, you should be able to eliminate all possibilities on your side (assuming - lol - you have done the full monty of my suggestions to the letter - i.e. verifying your ADSL kit and its cables and filters and and, etc. , your computer, etc. - where verifying means checking your kit somewhere else to see that a known good connection at another place continues to work with your kit; and equally using someone else's known good kit at your place to see if their kit also fails with your connection / line, etc.)... (p.s. some of that may be a bit of the top - but not really / not in reality!).. (particularly after you have replaced the master socket) at which juncture this ball is more firmly in either your ISPs court (something wrong on their side - e.g. / i.e. their line card if you're LLU with Talk Talk, or their modem bank, or some other such on their side) or BT Open Reach's court (something wrong with the line, etc.). Hope this helps. Otherwise - your connection speeds / throughput seem nice. I think the real question though is "packet loss"... i.e. when your connection is working are you suffering a lot of frequent noise / errors on the line - i.e. data having to be resent because it got lost / corrupted due to noise / a bad connection, etc. Their are various ways you can test this... the easiest would be either one of the online programs or free programs, else you can do it with Windows itself - just not quite so exciting, fun or user friendly. Go to "Start" button -> choose Run -> type "command" -> in the black text window that comes up type "ping -t www.bbc.co.uk" . This will keep testing the connection to, in this case [url]www.bbc.co.uk[/url], until you tell it to stop. You can press CTRL + BREAK (on the "Pause" key - usually top right of the keyboard, near Scroll Lock and Print Screen) - this will give you a live update on the statistics without interrupting the test. Or when you want to stop the test press CTRL + C . This will stop the test and give the final results. What you are interested in is the "Lost" count.. should really be 0% or maybe very very low i.e. 1% or less. Equally, you can look at the pattern of speeds for each data packets as it when to the bbc .... watch as it scrolls past and look at the time = bit... in ms... It should be fairly steady or constant. If it is fluctuating a lot (>10/20%) and regularly... this may be another issue... Let us know what you discover and how you get on, etc. ! Best wishes, News Reader P.s. The packet loss tests, etc. are a bit superfluous really because you are suffering a serious connection problem - i.e. complete loss of sync / disconnection. Hence, their is a more major or real and serious problem either with your hardware, their hardware or the configuration, etc. (Hence why your genuine and full complete fault testing of your own hardware, etc. is probably so necessary / more important). P.p.s. You can test your connection to any address - doesn't have to be the bbc - just enter the address you want to test. E.g. [url]www.yahoo.com[/url] ; [url]www.nasa.gov[/url] ; [url]www.sega.co.jp[/url] ; [url]www.bmw.de[/url] ; etc. Also normally ping testing is done with out the " -t " bit which just tells the computer to keep checking until you tell it to stop. The standard version of a ping test is to test 3 or 4 times and give you the average results - feel free to try it (i.e. without the " -t " bit) - it is just in this case we are acutely trying to test packet loss (and a known or specific problem scenario) rather than latency (how long it takes a data packet to get to a destination) (or just a general test / general interest test of an otherwise expected or known to be working normally connection) so lots of tests rather than just 3 or 4 is more useful / necessary, etc. And whilst we are at it, the other one you might like is tracert. Same as above... but instead of typing ping type "tracert www.bbc.co.uk" ... you don't need any other bits (like -t, etc.). This will test the whole route, every step, and three times for each step, anything not working or a lost packet will come up as a * . Again, you should not have packet loss ( * 's ) and times should be fairly consistent, no big differences on the same line (or THAT big between lines - depends, e.g. if tracing the route to NASA in America one of the lines will be a leap across the Atlantic ocean so you expect a good 20 / 30 ms leap between lines their!). Equally, some hosts (bbc, yahoo, etc.) do not allow ping tests (which is all traceroute is a fancy version of really), and so will only show *'s or 100% packet loss (i.e. they are probably firewalled and refusing to acknowledge your or reply). Likewise with traceroute, you may find some hops on the list refuse to reply so for that line you may get all *'s ... or if your final destination is firewalled / not replying.. you will get all *'s... and it will keep on trying so press CTRL+C to stop it if you are sure it has reached the end host and the end host is not replying., etc. You will get the hang of it / the idea. Finally, for courtesy's sake, some people see excess pinging as a bit like spam, or attacking. The odd handful of a few pings is fine, and people like the bbc don't mind at all - it is all part of useful network testing and diagnostics, but for the record / completeness whatever I am just letting you know that some people don't like it - basically it is fine and a normal, sensible and necessary part of the internet, but don't go to crazy pinging the living xyz out of your neighbour for example ;) or the military (not that I suppose they will really mind / care - but still). :) |
|
|||
|
"News Reader" <no@email.invalid> wrote in message news:Y2cIi.32172$ka7.23251@newsfe4-gui.ntli.net...[color=blue] > > "JakeD" <JakeD@jdjdjvvdjdjdj.com> wrote in message > news:gvmqe3hj5sph6jlt3n8pc6gpl23nk4t1ru@4ax.com...[color=green] >> On Sun, 16 Sep 2007 17:10:40 +0100, JakeD <JakeD@jdjdjvvdjdjdj.com> >> wrote: >>[color=darkred] >>>PS. Today, during one of the breaks in my bradband connection, I >>>disconnected the loud bell from the BT master socket. This made no >>>difference; I still could not conect to the net. >>> >>>When the new master socket arrives, I'll try replacing the face plate.[/color][/color][/color] < SNIP > useful network testing and diagnostics, but for the record / completeness[color=blue] > whatever I am just letting you know that some people don't like it - > basically it is fine and a normal, sensible and necessary part of the > internet, but don't go to crazy pinging the living xyz out of your > neighbour for example ;) or the military (not that I suppose they will > really mind / care - but still). :) > > > >[/color] By the way... For completeness... The black text window is called a command prompt. I told you to open it using "command", that was because I don't know what version of Windows you are using, and that should work with most versions, however you can use "cmd" if you have a newer version of windows and it should be a slightly more feature rich version (not that you will be able to tell very easily :) ). Further, the correct way to end a command prompt session is to type "exit" at the... lol - funnily enough... command prompt, and the session / window will close. :) .. Failing that just hit the "X" in the top right - lol. Usually a good idea to and standard practise to bang CTRL+C or CTRL+BREAK a few times if you get stuck with something in a command prompt window (it means cancel or abort) and short return you to the command prompt where you can try something else or type "exit" to finish. All the bits in "quotes" are to be typed exactly as they appear within the quotes but without typing the quotes ;) . Best wishes, News Reader |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|