The UK's Number One VoIP Resource
This is a discussion on SIP with Siemens HiPath 2000 within the uk.telecom.voip forums, part of the Newsgroup Forums category; Anyone had any experience with the above? I've tried an Atcom AT-320, X-lite, a Fujitsu FDX-840 ...
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
Anyone had any experience with the above?
I've tried an Atcom AT-320, X-lite, a Fujitsu FDX-840 and a Mitel 5220 handset, and none of them will register to the PBX if password authentication is enabled. If I disable password authentication, the extensions register and can make and receive calls fine [although the Atcom wouldn't register at all unless I set the registration timeout to be exactly the same as what the HiPath wanted]. Also, has anyone managed to get a HiPath<->Asterisk SIP trunk working? My best efforts have resulted in '603 Decline': <-- SIP read from 192.168.13.2:5060: SIP/2.0 100 Trying Call-ID: 5080936e49400afb72fb3ba86aa5e966@192.168.3.119 CSeq: 102 INVITE From: "Alex D" <sip:2001@192.168.3.119>;tag=as1b2bc26e To: <sip:15@192.168.13.2>;tag=9495b74cdee172b Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.3.119:5060;branch=z9hG4bK75cf93c4;rport Content-Length: 0 User-Agent: HiPath 2000 V1.0 M5T SIP-UA SAFE/v3.6.5.9 --- (8 headers 0 lines) --- asterisk1*CLI> <-- SIP read from 192.168.13.2:5060: SIP/2.0 603 Decline Call-ID: 5080936e49400afb72fb3ba86aa5e966@192.168.3.119 CSeq: 102 INVITE From: "Alex D" <sip:2001@192.168.3.119>;tag=as1b2bc26e To: <sip:15@192.168.13.2>;tag=9495b74cdee172b Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.3.119:5060;branch=z9hG4bK75cf93c4;rport Content-Length: 0 Reason:Q.850; cause=0; text="" User-Agent: HiPath 2000 V1.0 M5T SIP-UA SAFE/v3.6.5.9 --- (9 headers 0 lines) --- -- Got SIP response 603 "Decline" back from 192.168.13.2 Transmitting (NAT) to 192.168.13.2:5060: ACK sip:15@192.168.13.2 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.3.119:5060;branch=z9hG4bK75cf93c4;rport From: "Alex D" <sip:2001@192.168.3.119>;tag=as1b2bc26e To: <sip:15@192.168.13.2>;tag=9495b74cdee172b Contact: <sip:2001@192.168.3.119> Call-ID: 5080936e49400afb72fb3ba86aa5e966@192.168.3.119 CSeq: 102 ACK User-Agent: Asterisk PBX Max-Forwards: 70 Content-Length: 0 -- <http://ale.cx/> (AIM:troffasky) (UnSoEsNpEaTm@ale.cx) 13:04:01 up 33 days, 18:49, 3 users, load average: 0.26, 0.57, 0.81 09 f9 11 02 9d 74 e3 5b d8 41 56 c5 63 56 88 c0 |
|
|||
|
alexd wrote:[color=blue]
> Anyone had any experience with the above? > I've tried an Atcom AT-320, X-lite, a Fujitsu FDX-840 and a Mitel 5220 > handset, and none of them will register to the PBX if password > authentication is enabled. If I disable password authentication, the > extensions register and can make and receive calls fine [although the Atcom > wouldn't register at all unless I set the registration timeout to be > exactly the same as what the HiPath wanted].[/color] I don't the 2000 is really designed to support SIP handsets. Only the 8000 does. Tim |
|
|||
|
Tim wrote:
[color=blue] > alexd wrote:[color=green] >> Anyone had any experience with the above? >> I've tried an Atcom AT-320, X-lite, a Fujitsu FDX-840 and a Mitel 5220 >> handset, and none of them will register to the PBX if password >> authentication is enabled. If I disable password authentication, the >> extensions register and can make and receive calls fine [although the >> Atcom wouldn't register at all unless I set the registration timeout to >> be exactly the same as what the HiPath wanted].[/color] > > I don't the 2000 is really designed to support SIP handsets.[/color] FSVO 'support'. That probably explains why I couldn't find a way to create SIP extensions through the web interface, then. I had to use Manager-E, and then use the web interface to configure them. I did think it was a particularly obtuse way of doing things. However, once done, they work just fine. -- <http://ale.cx/> (AIM:troffasky) (UnSoEsNpEaTm@ale.cx) 21:04:32 up 34 days, 2:49, 3 users, load average: 3.96, 2.96, 1.85 09 f9 11 02 9d 74 e3 5b d8 41 56 c5 63 56 88 c0 |
|
|||
|
alexd wrote:[color=blue]
> FSVO 'support'. That probably explains why I couldn't find a way to create > SIP extensions through the web interface, then. I had to use Manager-E, and > then use the web interface to configure them. I did think it was a > particularly obtuse way of doing things. However, once done, they work just > fine.[/color] But with no authentication support? Tim |
|
|||
|
Tim wrote:
[color=blue] > alexd wrote:[color=green] >> FSVO 'support'. That probably explains why I couldn't find a way to >> create SIP extensions through the web interface, then. I had to use >> Manager-E, and then use the web interface to configure them. I did think >> it was a particularly obtuse way of doing things. However, once done, >> they work just fine.[/color] > > But with no authentication support?[/color] Correct. It must be trying to use some oddball auth scheme or something. Just install asterisk on it if you want authentication - any idea what the root password is? ;-) -- <http://ale.cx/> (AIM:troffasky) (UnSoEsNpEaTm@ale.cx) 10:09:40 up 34 days, 15:55, 3 users, load average: 1.17, 1.21, 1.29 09 f9 11 02 9d 74 e3 5b d8 41 56 c5 63 56 88 c0 |
|
|||
|
alexd wrote:[color=blue]
> Correct. It must be trying to use some oddball auth scheme or something. > Just install asterisk on it if you want authentication - any idea what the > root password is? ;-) >[/color] The bit of Siemens I deal with is a different department to HiPath. I'm wondering if a C460IP will authenticate. Tim |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|