UKVoIPTalk.com

"Desk Rabbit" <nospam@example.com> wrote in message
news:g46dnUiCWI_ALsjbRVnytwA@pipex.net[color=blue]
> Ivor Jones wrote:[/color]

[snip]
[color=blue][color=green]
> > It's still spam. It was unsolicited and the poster
> > doesn't give an email address that is valid, nor a
> > website to check out.[/color]
>
> Make up your mind. If they had posted a web site you'd be
> complaining it was spam now you are complaining its spam
> because they didn't post a web site! FFS![/color]

Irrelevant. It would have been spam whether they had or not.

Ivor

<clavox@btinternet.com> wrote in message
news:qb7c5398en5sh83bejebjk303vha441abp@4ax.com[color=blue]
> On Thu, 24 May 2007 16:48:15 +0100, Desk Rabbit
> <nospam@example.com> wrote:
>
>[color=green]
> > Make up your mind. If they had posted a web site you'd
> > be complaining it was spam now you are complaining its
> > spam because they didn't post a web site! FFS![/color]
> Fick in he .[/color]

Que..?

<clavox@btinternet.com> wrote in message
news:n47c539g2i0ojfsu6sch0orbj36cd1k357@4ax.com[color=blue]
> On Thu, 24 May 2007 15:55:54 +0100, "Ivor Jones"
> <ivor@despammed.invalid> wrote:
>
>[color=green]
> > It's still spam. It was unsolicited and the poster
> > doesn't give an email address that is valid, nor a
> > website to check out. Not signs of a reputable company
> > IMO.[/color]
>
> Ivor go away until till you can think of some other words
> to type besides spam there's a good chap you are totally
> obsessed with spam .[/color]

Ron go away until till you can think of some other words
to type besides Ivor go away there's a good chap you are totally
obsessed with pointless replies to me.

Ivor

"NicHughes" <nichughes@mailandnews.com> wrote in message
news:1180046710.454467.319030@p47g2000hsd.googlegroups.com[color=blue]
> On 23 May, 18:17, "Ivor Jones" <i...@despammed.invalid>
> wrote:[color=green]
> > "Infant Newbie" <inf...@newbie.new> wrote in message
> >
> > news:f305k2$fij$1@news.freedom2surf.net
> >[color=darkred]
> > > We will launch a new VOIP service soon. We are
> > > sounding out u guys n gals in this newsgroup! Tell me
> > > what you would like from our service[/color]
> >
> > No spam.
> >[/color]
>
> That's right, this is no spam. So they are off to a good
> start on that requirement then.
>
> With a Breidbart Index of precisely 1 it bears no
> resemblance at all to the accepted definitions of usenet
> spam.[/color]

If you say so. I beg to differ.

Ivor

"RH" <rh@no-spicedham.exelsys.com> wrote in message
news:f350dl$p6r$1$8300dec7@news.demon.co.uk[color=blue][color=green][color=darkred]
> > > Not sure why other have been so against your post as
> > > most people complain companies do not listen to what
> > > potential customer want. Maybe if SIPGATE had some
> > > respect for their customers and listen to them, they
> > > would not get so slagged off on here.[/color]
> >
> > Strange, I've never had any issues with them. At least
> > they have an accessible website and email addresses
> > that work.[/color]
>
> Ivor never said you had issues, never said I had issues
> with sipgate but others had, any kind of company being
> proactive with customer feedback should be welcomed.[/color]

Indeed. But a company that uses a munged address and doesn't provide a
website where you can check out their products is somewhat suspicious to
my mind.
[color=blue]
> uk.telecom.voip would be far better if we had more good
> constructive threads. Finding what people like in an ISP
> service is far more constructive than your pointless THIS
> IS SPAM messages, sometimes I think you enjoy being
> spammed so you can get into high and mighty BS mode like a over zealous
> traffic warden.[/color]

If you say so.

Ivor

<clavox@btinternet.com> wrote in message
news:dm7c539crd0m5odvqp3fuj18mi65ctebdd@4ax.com[color=blue]
> On Thu, 24 May 2007 22:34:42 +0100, "RH"
> <rh@no-spicedham.exelsys.com> wrote:
>
>[color=green]
> > . Finding what people like in an ISP service is far more
> > constructive than your pointless THIS IS SPAM messages,
> > sometimes I think you enjoy being spammed so you can
> > get into high and mighty
> > BS mode like a over zealous traffic warden.
> >[/color]
> Course he likes being spammed how else would he get
> noticed here or anywhere else .[/color]

And you don't reply to everything I post in order that you can get
noticed, do you, Ron..?

Ivor

<clavox@btinternet.com> wrote in message
news:9q7c53pdgi4f139e3lqk224l96g5nj7ueq@4ax.com[color=blue]
> On Thu, 24 May 2007 18:12:55 +0100, Desk Rabbit
> <nospam@example.com> wrote:
>
>[color=green]
> > First ignore Ivor.[/color]
> That had to come first .[/color]

If only you would, Ron.

Ivor

On Fri, 25 May 2007 02:42:48 +0100, "Rob" <nobody@this.place.invalid>
wrote:
[color=blue]
>
><clavox@btinternet.com> wrote in message
>news:mo6c53h6rbnh9c8emt6u7426nc7ijj03e9@4ax.com...[color=green][color=darkred]
>> >[/color]
>> Take no notice Ivor is totally obsessed with spam.[/color]
>
>And you wouldn't be totally obsessed with Ivor would you?
>
>Rob
>[/color]
No I am not I am obsessed with anyone who goes on and on about such
things but there is ONLY Ivor that seems to do this .

On Fri, 25 May 2007 12:21:05 +0100, "Ivor Jones"
<ivor@despammed.invalid> wrote:
[color=blue]
><clavox@btinternet.com> wrote in message
>news:gs6c53lpmrltk4nb6ilunvlli02o8q22u1@4ax.com[color=green]
>> On Thu, 24 May 2007 17:03:35 +0100, alexd
>> <troffasky@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>[color=darkred]
>> > Ivor Jones wrote:
>> >
>> > > "Infant Newbie" <infant@newbie.new> wrote in message
>> > > news:f32j6p$a5h$1@news.freedom2surf.net
>> >
>> > > > What makes this spam?
>> > >
>> > > It's unsolicited. That's the definition of spam.
>> >
>> > In your opinion. If you don't like the thread, just
>> > ignore it.[/color]
>> He couldn't how else could he get himself noticed don't
>> forget he OWN'S this forum or thinks he does .[/color]
>
>Newsgroup.[/color]
FORUM

On Fri, 25 May 2007 12:22:40 +0100, "Ivor Jones"
<ivor@despammed.invalid> wrote:

[color=blue]
>well a newsgroup
>posting may not be email, but it's close enough.[/color]
FORUM
[color=blue]
>Yes it was.[/color]

NO IT WASEN 'T