UKVoIPTalk.com

Ivor Jones has brought this to us :[color=blue][color=green]
>>
>> But this IS a FORUM Ivor no matter what you say to the
>> contrary .[/color]
>
> Here we go again..
>
> Look at the program you are using to read this. Does it say forum anywhere in
> its setup..?
>[/color]

Hehe. Mine does actually. Obviously written by foreigners...!?

"NicHughes" <nichughes@mailandnews.com> wrote in message
news:1181374421.397749.211500@h2g2000hsg.googlegroups.com[color=blue]
> On 9 Jun, 01:42, "Ivor Jones" <i...@despammed.invalid>
> wrote:
>[color=green]
> >
> > Fine, and thanks for that. But I will not stop
> > defending myself. Nor will I stop attacking spam and
> > spammers. Nor people who call this group a forum.
> >[/color]
>
> Ivor, what bugs me is how you are ultra-keen on a strict
> definition of newsgroup but totally refuse to even deal
> with the definition of newsgroup spam - which has been
> posted on this thread and by which the OP was
> definitively not spam. Its seems to be the case that you
> only care about the accepted meanings of terms when it
> suits you - such mere facts are to be ignored if they do
> not support your current rant.[/color]

So ignore me.

Ivor

Ivor Jones wrote:[color=blue]
> "Desk Rabbit" <nospam@example.com> wrote in message
> news:7MKdnTcJhNY-AvTbnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@pipex.net
>[color=green]
>>Brian wrote:[/color]
>
>
> [snip]
>
>[color=green][color=darkred]
>>>Translation: 'I've got my hands over my ears'
>>>
>>>Brian.
>>>
>>>[/color]
>>
>>Well summed up.[/color]
>
>
> So why *don't* you killfile me..?[/color]

Becuase killfile is a sledgehammer to crack a nut. Generally you post
good relevant stuff but your ideas on spam in newsgroups is completely
out of whack and OTT.

Ivor Jones wrote:[color=blue]
> "Desk Rabbit" <nospam@example.com> wrote in message
> news:7MKdnTYJhNbOPfTbnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@pipex.net
>[color=green]
>>Ivor Jones wrote:
>>[color=darkred]
>>>"Desk Rabbit" <nospam@example.com> wrote in message
>>>news:eN2dnYqj6uLf3vTbRVnyhAA@pipex.net
>>>
>>>>Ivor Jones wrote:
>>>
>>>[snip]
>>>
>>>
>>>>>Referring to dictionaries will do you no good, it
>>>>>didn't work for the forum/newsgroup debacle and it
>>>>>won't work now.
>>>>
>>>>I guess not because your definition of spam and
>>>>adverts are not the same as the rest of the planet.
>>>>Guess I should look in the "Ivor book of words I
>>>>mangled" Do you have the ISBN number?
>>>
>>>The whole rest of the planet..? Are you sure..?
>>>
>>>You have the option of killfiling me, why don't you..?[/color]
>>
>>Because then we would never resolve your skewed view.[/color]
>
>
> You never will anyway.[/color]
It is difficult when you are trying to have discussion with someone and
all they do is put their fingers in their ears and sing "la la la"

Jono wrote:[color=blue]
> Ivor Jones has brought this to us :
>[color=green][color=darkred]
>>>
>>> But this IS a FORUM Ivor no matter what you say to the
>>> contrary .[/color]
>>
>>
>> Here we go again..
>>
>> Look at the program you are using to read this. Does it say forum
>> anywhere in its setup..?
>>[/color]
>
> Hehe. Mine does actually. Obviously written by foreigners...!?
>
>[/color]
ROFL!

On 2007-06-09, Ivor Jones <ivor@despammed.invalid> wrote:
[color=blue]
> "Brian" <bandj@o2.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:slrnf6j8qp.2tq.bandj@mymachine.invalid[color=green]
>> On 2007-06-08, Ivor Jones <ivor@despammed.invalid> wrote:
>>[color=darkred]
>> > You have the option of killfiling me, why don't you..?[/color]
>>
>> You are very fond of suggesting this. Listening and responding is
>> part of being human and integral to social intercourse. Why seek to
>> limit it?[/color]
>
> Because, basically, I'm fed up with the same old responses time after
> time.[/color]

How irritating; the same old responses to the same old assertions.
[color=blue]
> If you don't agree with me or don't like it, don't respond.[/color]

It seems you favour sycophancy to opposition, silence to expression of
opinion and promote monologue rather than dialogue. It doesn't work like
that here.

Brian.

On 9 Jun, 11:33, "Ivor Jones" <i...@despammed.invalid> wrote:
[color=blue]
>
> So ignore me.
>[/color]

Oh no, this has gone on so long you've got me curious. Why such
blatant inconsistency? What are you trying to achieve?

You appear to know what usenet is, you are clearly bright enough to
understand what usenet spam is. The rest of the time you seem
reasonable enough so what's up?

Enquiring minds want to know (or at least this one does).

--
Nic

On Sat, 9 Jun 2007 15:00:30 +0000 (UTC), Brian <bandj@o2.co.uk> wrote:
[color=blue]
>On 2007-06-09, Ivor Jones <ivor@despammed.invalid> wrote:
>[color=green]
>> "Brian" <bandj@o2.co.uk> wrote in message
>> news:slrnf6j8qp.2tq.bandj@mymachine.invalid[color=darkred]
>>> On 2007-06-08, Ivor Jones <ivor@despammed.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>> > You have the option of killfiling me, why don't you..?
>>>
>>> You are very fond of suggesting this. Listening and responding is
>>> part of being human and integral to social intercourse. Why seek to
>>> limit it?[/color]
>>
>> Because, basically, I'm fed up with the same old responses time after
>> time.[/color]
>
>How irritating; the same old responses to the same old assertions.
>[color=green]
>> If you don't agree with me or don't like it, don't respond.[/color]
>
>It seems you favour sycophancy to opposition, silence to expression of
>opinion and promote monologue rather than dialogue. It doesn't work like
>that here.
>
>Brian.[/color]
Don't you be telling the almighty Ivor what doesn't and does work here
Brian,the almighty Ivor started and owns this forum remember :))))))).

"Brian" <bandj@o2.co.uk> wrote in message
news:slrnf6ljin.2tq.bandj@mymachine.invalid[color=blue]
> On 2007-06-09, Ivor Jones <ivor@despammed.invalid> wrote:
>[color=green]
> > "Brian" <bandj@o2.co.uk> wrote in message
> > news:slrnf6j8qp.2tq.bandj@mymachine.invalid[color=darkred]
> > > On 2007-06-08, Ivor Jones <ivor@despammed.invalid>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > You have the option of killfiling me, why don't
> > > > you..?
> > >
> > > You are very fond of suggesting this. Listening and
> > > responding is part of being human and integral to
> > > social intercourse. Why seek to limit it?[/color]
> >
> > Because, basically, I'm fed up with the same old
> > responses time after time.[/color]
>
> How irritating; the same old responses to the same old
> assertions.[/color]

Then don't read them.
[color=blue][color=green]
> > If you don't agree with me or don't like it,
> > don't respond.[/color]
>
> It seems you favour sycophancy to opposition, silence to
> expression of opinion and promote monologue rather than
> dialogue. It doesn't work like that here.[/color]

Fine, then put up with my opinions. I won't stop telling the truth.

Ivor

"Desk Rabbit" <spam-me-not@example.com> wrote in message
news:TcKdnXfsFuPQBPfbRVnygAA@pipex.net[color=blue]
> Ivor Jones wrote:[color=green]
> > "Desk Rabbit" <nospam@example.com> wrote in message
> > news:7MKdnTYJhNbOPfTbnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@pipex.net
> >[color=darkred]
> > > Ivor Jones wrote:
> > >
> > > > "Desk Rabbit" <nospam@example.com> wrote in message
> > > > news:eN2dnYqj6uLf3vTbRVnyhAA@pipex.net
> > > >
> > > > > Ivor Jones wrote:
> > > >
> > > > [snip]
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > > Referring to dictionaries will do you no good,
> > > > > > it didn't work for the forum/newsgroup debacle
> > > > > > and it won't work now.
> > > > >
> > > > > I guess not because your definition of spam and
> > > > > adverts are not the same as the rest of the
> > > > > planet. Guess I should look in the "Ivor book of
> > > > > words I mangled" Do you have the ISBN number?
> > > >
> > > > The whole rest of the planet..? Are you sure..?
> > > >
> > > > You have the option of killfiling me, why don't
> > > > you..?
> > >
> > > Because then we would never resolve your skewed view.[/color]
> >
> >
> > You never will anyway.[/color][/color]
[color=blue]
> It is difficult when you are trying to have discussion
> with someone and all they do is put their fingers in
> their ears and sing "la la la"[/color]

So don't reply. Easy. Problem gone.

Ivor