UKVoIPTalk.com

"RH" <rh@no-spicedham.exelsys.com> wrote in message
news:f3rsdj$aqt$1$8302bc10@news.demon.co.uk[color=blue]
> "Ivor Jones" <ivor@despammed.invalid> wrote in message
> news:5ccsq7F2vl2mrU1@mid.individual.net...
>[color=green][color=darkred]
> > > If the OP was spam, please explain how, preferable
> > > without resorting to thought-crime or future-crime.[/color]
> >
> > It was spam. If you can't see that, it's not my problem.[/color]
> Ivor,
>
> Everyone else who has made comment has said it was not
> spam, you are the only one.[/color]

That doesn't make what I said any less true.
[color=blue]
> If you had any balls you would admit in hindsight you
> made a mistake, I know your happy for everyone to think
> your on here yout to troll, but you would get some kind
> of respect back if you admitted it, instead of being
> regarded as the village idiot.[/color]

I couldn't care less how you regard me. I'm not here to win popularity
contests. I'll say to you what I say to everyone who doesn't like what I
say - use your killfile if you feel that strongly. Otherwise put up with
it.

Ivor

Ivor Jones wrote:[color=blue]
> "Desk Rabbit" <spam-me-not@example.com> wrote in message
> news:YoednTxOH5y0H_3bRVnysQA@pipex.net
>
> [snip]
>
>[color=green]
>>Ivor, for goodness sake, look at the huge thread you have
>>created.[/color]
>
>
> I didn't create the thread..![/color]

My what a short memory you have Ivor. I now understand why you have
difficulty retaining the concept of what spam is and why your definition
alters with each posting.

Path:
border1.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: "Ivor Jones" <ivor@despammed.invalid>
Newsgroups: uk.telecom.voip
Subject: Re: What do you want from a VOIP provider
Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 18:17:01 +0100
Lines: 11
Message-ID: <5bjb8hF2srgukU1@mid.individual.net>
References: <f305k2$fij$1@news.freedom2surf.net>
X-Trace: individual.net ZFnc6g9Xohg7oxTnmBs82AyINH8ZK+BI3OAtAv7FB2xkALGkbT
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3028
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Response
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com uk.telecom.voip:26829

"Infant Newbie" <infant@newbie.new> wrote in message
news:f305k2$fij$1@news.freedom2surf.net[color=blue]
> We will launch a new VOIP service soon. We are sounding
> out u guys n gals in this newsgroup! Tell me what you
> would like from our service[/color]

No spam.

Ivor


[color=blue]
>If you don't want it to continue, stop
> posting to it..![/color]

I'd rather you saw sense actually.

[color=blue]
>[color=green]
>>The OP asked a simple question - once. Yes, once. They
>>advertised nothing. Understand that? Any sane person
>>could not possibly call that spam. Only a raving lunatic could call it
>>spam "Because it might
>>lead to advertising in the future"
>>
>>You are making yourself look like a completely obsessive
>>fool.[/color]
>
>
> Do you think I could care less what you think about me..?[/color]
Nope. Just wanted to let you know how you are coming across.

Ivor Jones wrote:[color=blue]
> "RH" <rh@no-spicedham.exelsys.com> wrote in message
> news:f3rsdj$aqt$1$8302bc10@news.demon.co.uk
>[color=green]
>>"Ivor Jones" <ivor@despammed.invalid> wrote in message
>>news:5ccsq7F2vl2mrU1@mid.individual.net...
>>
>>[color=darkred]
>>>>If the OP was spam, please explain how, preferable
>>>>without resorting to thought-crime or future-crime.
>>>
>>>It was spam. If you can't see that, it's not my problem.[/color]
>>
>>Ivor,
>>
>>Everyone else who has made comment has said it was not
>>spam, you are the only one.[/color]
>
>
> That doesn't make what I said any less true.[/color]
Indeed, it makes it more wrong every time you say it and makes you look
more stupid and foolish which each repition.

Perhaps you'd be happy to argue that the world is flat or the moon is
made out of cheese?

"Desk Rabbit" <spam-me-not@example.com> wrote in message
news:FM6dnbEzSq5mBvzbRVnyjwA@pipex.net[color=blue]
> Ivor Jones wrote:[color=green]
> > "Desk Rabbit" <spam-me-not@example.com> wrote in message
> > news:YoednTxOH5y0H_3bRVnysQA@pipex.net
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> >[color=darkred]
> > > Ivor, for goodness sake, look at the huge thread you
> > > have created.[/color]
> >
> >
> > I didn't create the thread..![/color]
>
> My what a short memory you have Ivor. I now understand
> why you have difficulty retaining the concept of what
> spam is and why your definition alters with each posting.[/color]

[snip]

If you read it again, you'll see that I am not the OP. The OP created the
thread, not me..!
[color=blue][color=green]
> > If you don't want it to continue, stop
> > posting to it..![/color]
>
> I'd rather you saw sense actually.[/color]

I repeat - If you don't want it to continue, stop posting to it..!
[color=blue][color=green]
> > Do you think I could care less what you think about
> > me..?[/color][/color]
[color=blue]
> Nope. Just wanted to let you know how you are coming
> across.[/color]

To you. Again, I could care less. You know what to do.

Ivor

"Desk Rabbit" <spam-me-not@example.com> wrote in message
news:FM6dnbAzSq6CAPzbRVnyjwA@pipex.net

[snip]
[color=blue]
> Indeed, it makes it more wrong every time you say it and
> makes you look more stupid and foolish which each
> repition.[/color]

Repition..?

I could care less if you think I'm foolish/stupid. If you want this thread
to stop, you know what to do.
[color=blue]
> Perhaps you'd be happy to argue that the world is flat or
> the moon is made out of cheese?[/color]

What has that got to do with it..? If they were, I would. They aren't, I
don't. In either case it's not relevant. The OP was spam.

Ivor

Ivor Jones wrote:[color=blue]
> "ßødincµs²°°°" <this.em@il.is.invalid> wrote in message
> news:MPG.20c97a0ba964317f989741@text.news.blueyonder.co.uk
>
> [snip]
>[color=green]
>> Ron, sin bin for life. You're like a purgative, you
>> irritate out the s**t from people. Don't you have
>> anything else to do, you little troll? Grow up.
>>
>> Ivor, get a life... outside of here, I mean! Got get some
>> fresh air, and stop policing this NG. And stop feeding
>> the trolls.[/color]
>
> If I see something that I consider against the charter, I will speak out.
> If that's a problem, it's not mine.
>[color=green]
>> I don't mind if somebody posts an announcement on a new
>> service, device or software - even if the NG charter
>> forbids advertising.[/color]
>
> Nor do I, if that's all it is. The OP was spamming. That's why the charter
> forbids advertising.[/color]
WHERE WAS THE ADVERT????????????????????

Ivor Jones wrote:[color=blue]
> "Desk Rabbit" <spam-me-not@example.com> wrote in message
> news:FM6dnbEzSq5mBvzbRVnyjwA@pipex.net[color=green]
>> Ivor Jones wrote:[color=darkred]
>>> "Desk Rabbit" <spam-me-not@example.com> wrote in message
>>> news:YoednTxOH5y0H_3bRVnysQA@pipex.net
>>>
>>> [snip]
>>>
>>>
>>>> Ivor, for goodness sake, look at the huge thread you
>>>> have created.
>>>
>>> I didn't create the thread..![/color]
>> My what a short memory you have Ivor. I now understand
>> why you have difficulty retaining the concept of what
>> spam is and why your definition alters with each posting.[/color]
>
> [snip]
>
> If you read it again, you'll see that I am not the OP. The OP created the
> thread, not me..![/color]
Either you are being deliberately obtuse or you are a moron. I can't
decide which yet.
[color=blue]
>[color=green][color=darkred]
>>> If you don't want it to continue, stop
>>> posting to it..![/color]
>> I'd rather you saw sense actually.[/color]
>
> I repeat - If you don't want it to continue, stop posting to it..![/color]
Stop calling messages that are clearly and obviously to even a single
cell organisim.

Ivor Jones wrote:[color=blue]
> "Desk Rabbit" <spam-me-not@example.com> wrote in message
> news:FM6dnbAzSq6CAPzbRVnyjwA@pipex.net
>
> [snip]
>[color=green]
>> Indeed, it makes it more wrong every time you say it and
>> makes you look more stupid and foolish which each
>> repition.[/color]
>
> Repition..?[/color]
Repetition.

More haste less speed ;-)
[color=blue]
> I could care less if you think I'm foolish/stupid. If you want this thread
> to stop, you know what to do.
>[color=green]
>> Perhaps you'd be happy to argue that the world is flat or
>> the moon is made out of cheese?[/color]
>
> What has that got to do with it..?[/color]
Because those argument have as much foundation as your claim that the OP
was spam.

[color=blue]
> The OP was spam.[/color]

Only by your bizarre twisted definition.

On Sat, 2 Jun 2007 16:32:20 +0100, "Ivor Jones"
<ivor@despammed.invalid> wrote:

[color=blue]
>I'll say to you what I say to everyone who doesn't like what I
>say - use your killfile if you feel that strongly. Otherwise put up with
>it.[/color]
In that case it is time you practiced what you preach then instead of
coming here shouting your stupid mouth of about spam and spammers
PUT UP WITH IT OR KILL FILE IT .

On Mon, 04 Jun 2007 09:26:53 +0100, Desk Rabbit <nospam@example.com>
wrote:
[color=blue]
>Ivor Jones wrote:[color=green]
>> "ßødincµs²°°°" <this.em@il.is.invalid> wrote in message
>> news:MPG.20c97a0ba964317f989741@text.news.blueyonder.co.uk
>>
>> [snip]
>>[color=darkred]
>>> Ron, sin bin for life. You're like a purgative, you
>>> irritate out the s**t from people. Don't you have
>>> anything else to do, you little troll? Grow up.
>>>
>>> Ivor, get a life... outside of here, I mean! Got get some
>>> fresh air, and stop policing this NG. And stop feeding
>>> the trolls.[/color]
>>
>> If I see something that I consider against the charter, I will speak out.
>> If that's a problem, it's not mine.
>>[color=darkred]
>>> I don't mind if somebody posts an announcement on a new
>>> service, device or software - even if the NG charter
>>> forbids advertising.[/color]
>>
>> Nor do I, if that's all it is. The OP was spamming. That's why the charter
>> forbids advertising.[/color]
>WHERE WAS THE ADVERT????????????????????[/color]
Oh my God he is back to the stupid charter which no one takes any
notice of once again .