UKVoIPTalk.com

On Fri, 01 Jun 2007 21:31:27 +0100, Desk Rabbit
<spam-me-not@example.com> wrote:

[color=blue]
>You are making yourself look like a completely obsessive fool.[/color]

What a most apt and wonderful description for the pillock but what do
you mean " look like" he is a completely obsessive fool .

Ivor Jones wrote:[color=blue]
> "Paul Cupis" <paul@cupis.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:f3no6d$26j6$1@energise.enta.net...[color=green]
>> Ivor Jones wrote:[color=darkred]
>>> "Desk Rabbit" <nospam@example.com> wrote in message
>>> news:6pCdnRK2gY1kUMPbnZ2dnUVZ8qOtnZ2d@pipex.net
>>>> "Not at all. However if you were to try and advertise
>>>> your business here, that would be spam."
>>> Which is true, surely..? Are you saying that someone advertising here
>>> *isn't* spam..?[/color]
>> The OP was not advertising anything.[/color]
>
> And I told him I didn't want him to.[/color]

So you are now saying that s/he was not spamming, but you were advising
them against doing so in future?

If the OP was spam, please explain how, preferable without resorting to
thought-crime or future-crime.

<mymail@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1k3163poe5s9222s0gg6gpk8p2t0pqjmao@4ax.com...[color=blue]
> On Fri, 01 Jun 2007 21:31:27 +0100, Desk Rabbit
> <spam-me-not@example.com> wrote:
>
>[color=green]
> >You are making yourself look like a completely obsessive fool.[/color]
>
> What a most apt and wonderful description for the pillock but what do
> you mean " look like" he is a completely obsessive fool .[/color]

Yes Clavox, we all know what you think.

Despite your denials, I think most people here will have come to the
conclusion that you are posting in this thread under two different
identities, presumably to try and give more volume to your dumb opinions.

Rob

"Theo Markettos" <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote in message
news:1-s*kQbMr@news.chiark.greenend.org.uk...[color=blue]
> RH <rh@no-spicedham.exelsys.com> wrote:
> Who's that? It sounds interesting... rather than signup with a million
> VOIP
> providers in the hope the expensive ones will have better call quality
> rather just be ripoffs.
>[/color]
VoipTalk offered different grade rates for some destinations if I recall

On Fri, 01 Jun 2007 00:35:03 GMT, ßødincµs²°°° <this.em@il.is.invalid>
wrote:

[color=blue]
>I don't mind if somebody posts an announcement on a new service, device
>or software - even if the NG charter forbids advertising.[/color]

Oh my God now you have done it the pillock has been quiet about his
obsession and fixation with the stupid useless charter now he will
start of again about it for another six months or so,this is against
the charter that is against the charter, **** THE DAMNED CHARTER .

<mymail@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:dud263lmj2chhr68sdqm21blc89leemcqn@4ax.com[color=blue]
> On Fri, 01 Jun 2007 00:35:03 GMT, ßødincµs²°°°
> <this.em@il.is.invalid> wrote:
>
>[color=green]
> > I don't mind if somebody posts an announcement on a new
> > service, device or software - even if the NG charter
> > forbids advertising.[/color]
>
> Oh my God now you have done it the pillock has been quiet
> about his obsession and fixation with the stupid useless
> charter now he will start of again about it for another
> six months or so,this is against the charter that is
> against the charter, **** THE DAMNED CHARTER .[/color]

Reciprocal greetings, Ron. Now put me in your killfile and be done with
it.

Ivor

"Desk Rabbit" <spam-me-not@example.com> wrote in message
news:YoednTxOH5y0H_3bRVnysQA@pipex.net

[snip]
[color=blue]
> Ivor, for goodness sake, look at the huge thread you have
> created.[/color]

I didn't create the thread..! If you don't want it to continue, stop
posting to it..!
[color=blue]
>The OP asked a simple question - once. Yes, once. They
> advertised nothing. Understand that? Any sane person
> could not possibly call that spam. Only a raving lunatic could call it
> spam "Because it might
> lead to advertising in the future"
>
> You are making yourself look like a completely obsessive
> fool.[/color]

Do you think I could care less what you think about me..?

There's a killfile in your software somewhere, use it if you're that
bothered. I'm not.

Ivor

<mymail@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1k3163poe5s9222s0gg6gpk8p2t0pqjmao@4ax.com[color=blue]
> On Fri, 01 Jun 2007 21:31:27 +0100, Desk Rabbit
> <spam-me-not@example.com> wrote:
>
>[color=green]
> > You are making yourself look like a completely
> > obsessive fool.[/color]
>
> What a most apt and wonderful description for the pillock
> but what do you mean " look like" he is a completely
> obsessive fool .[/color]

And you're not..?

Ivor

"Paul Cupis" <paul@cupis.co.uk> wrote in message
news:f3q9g2$no2$1@energise.enta.net[color=blue]
> Ivor Jones wrote:[color=green]
> > "Paul Cupis" <paul@cupis.co.uk> wrote in message
> > news:f3no6d$26j6$1@energise.enta.net...[color=darkred]
> > > Ivor Jones wrote:
> > > > "Desk Rabbit" <nospam@example.com> wrote in message
> > > > news:6pCdnRK2gY1kUMPbnZ2dnUVZ8qOtnZ2d@pipex.net
> > > > > "Not at all. However if you were to try and
> > > > > advertise your business here, that would be spam."
> > > > Which is true, surely..? Are you saying that
> > > > someone advertising here *isn't* spam..?
> > > The OP was not advertising anything.[/color]
> >
> > And I told him I didn't want him to.[/color]
>
> So you are now saying that s/he was not spamming,[/color]

No.
[color=blue]
> but you
> were advising them against doing so in future?[/color]

Yes.
[color=blue]
> If the OP was spam, please explain how, preferable
> without resorting to thought-crime or future-crime.[/color]

It was spam. If you can't see that, it's not my problem.

Ivor

"Ivor Jones" <ivor@despammed.invalid> wrote in message
news:5ccsq7F2vl2mrU1@mid.individual.net...
[color=blue][color=green]
>> If the OP was spam, please explain how, preferable
>> without resorting to thought-crime or future-crime.[/color]
>
> It was spam. If you can't see that, it's not my problem.[/color]
Ivor,

Everyone else who has made comment has said it was not spam, you are the
only one.

If you had any balls you would admit in hindsight you made a mistake, I know
your happy for everyone to think
your on here yout to troll, but you would get some kind of respect back if
you admitted it, instead of being regarded as
the village idiot.