UKVoIPTalk.com

On Sun, 13 May 2007 22:52:15 GMT, [email]mymail@hotmail.com[/email] wrote:
[color=blue]
>On Sun, 13 May 2007 23:34:47 +0100, "News Reader" <no@email.invalid>
>wrote:
>
>[color=green][color=darkred]
>>> [url]www.vyke.co.uk[/url] seem pretty good - ~2 p/call I understand to most all of
>>> Western Europe (including the UK) and US / Canada, etc. with no
>>> subscription
>>> charge.[/color][/color]
>[color=green]
>>Just in case it wasn't clear. Vyke provided unlimited duration (not just 1
>>hour or some x p/min rate after a certain time) for 2 p and not just for UK
>>destinations (but all of Western Europe + the US and Canada) ... AND no
>>subscription charge. :)[/color]
>From what I have seen they only provide a service via desktop
>application I haven't seen any info regards using an ATA with their
>service .[/color]
No, their service works with an ATA just the same as any other SIP
operator.
Remove 'no_spam_' from email address.

"Brian A" <no_spam_bca1000@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:7sbg4391mn3r2raljt1nf7r4mo6nd5cemp@4ax.com...[color=blue]
>[color=green]
>>Just in case it wasn't clear. Vyke provided unlimited duration (not just 1
>>hour or some x p/min rate after a certain time) for 2 p and not just for
>>UK
>>destinations (but all of Western Europe + the US and Canada) ... AND no
>>subscription charge. :)
>>
>>I am not biased nor a customer - just sounds very very good where
>>voip.co.uk
>>only seem good. You can always use Vyke for outgoing and SIPgate for
>>incoming if an incoming number is necessary.[/color]
> I am a customer. I used Vyke for a while for my UK calls. However,
> calls sometimes drop out, the quality is poor or the audio works
> just one way. I still use Vyke, it is good value for money, and have
> tried their SMS sevice, which I have found to be good. However, for UK
> calls, if you want good audio quality, value and reliability I'd
> choose voip.co.uk.
> The only downside is the poor voicemail. It is well over a year ago
> when they said they would improve it. I don't use it now but I would
> guess that nothing has been done - it amazes me because you'd think
> they would want to put a shine on their service. I use Voxalot with
> voip.co.uk and other operators. It works very well.
>
> Remove 'no_spam_' from email address.[/color]


Hi,


Thank you very very much. Their is nothing better than first hand reports.

It would be great to have some further comparative reports to confirm this
is not localised or anomalous to your situation (provider, equipment,
configuration, or any other).

I really appreciate your input - that is undoubtedly amongst the, if not
the, most informative experiential report on Vyke and from a UK user to :) -
many thanks again.


Best wishes,




News Reader

Brian A wrote:[color=blue]
> On Sun, 13 May 2007 22:52:15 GMT, [email]mymail@hotmail.com[/email] wrote:
>[color=green]
>> On Sun, 13 May 2007 23:34:47 +0100, "News Reader" <no@email.invalid>
>> wrote:
>>
>>[color=darkred]
>>>> [url]www.vyke.co.uk[/url] seem pretty good - ~2 p/call I understand to most all of
>>>> Western Europe (including the UK) and US / Canada, etc. with no
>>>> subscription
>>>> charge.
>>> Just in case it wasn't clear. Vyke provided unlimited duration (not just 1
>>> hour or some x p/min rate after a certain time) for 2 p and not just for UK
>>> destinations (but all of Western Europe + the US and Canada) ... AND no
>>> subscription charge. :)[/color]
>>From what I have seen they only provide a service via desktop
>> application I haven't seen any info regards using an ATA with their
>> service .[/color]
> No, their service works with an ATA just the same as any other SIP
> operator.
> Remove 'no_spam_' from email address.[/color]


Hi how com no ones mentioning Vonage.co.uk ?
here good or bad experiences?

Heidy

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from [url]http://www.teranews.com[/url]

"Heidy" <Heidy.ManwayNOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:46599f77$0$16339$88260bb3@free.teranews.com

[snip]
[color=blue]
> Hi how com no ones mentioning Vonage.co.uk ?
> here good or bad experiences?[/color]

Well for a start, they're expensive, have no free interconnection with
other providers and the equipment they supply is locked. Wouldn't touch
them.

Ivor

On Sun, 27 May 2007 17:03:33 +0100, Heidy
<Heidy.ManwayNOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote:

[color=blue]
>Hi how com no ones mentioning Vonage.co.uk ?
>here good or bad experiences?[/color]

Nothing at all wrong with Vonage providing you have the usage
of such a service that warrants the little extra expense over and
above all others even though Vonage cost less than 25p day .
Many people will spend a lot more than that before they have been in a
pub or club five minutes tonight and flush the lot down the toilet
before closing time .

Ivor Jones wrote:[color=blue]
> "Heidy" <Heidy.ManwayNOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:46599f77$0$16339$88260bb3@free.teranews.com
>
> [snip]
>[color=green]
>> Hi how com no ones mentioning Vonage.co.uk ?
>> here good or bad experiences?[/color]
>
> Well for a start, they're expensive, have no free interconnection with
> other providers and the equipment they supply is locked. Wouldn't touch
> them.
>
> Ivor
>
>[/color]
Damn it I fell for them hook line and sinker but everyones got to learn
somewhere called the "learning curve" :)

Heidy

--
[url]http://snipurl.com/1jp9q[/url]

[url]http://snipurl.com/1joyw[/url]

[url]http://snipurl.com/1kocq[/url]

[url]http://snipurl.com/1kocr[/url]

[url]http://www.nolongerlonely.com[/url]

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from [url]http://www.teranews.com[/url]

On Sun, 27 May 2007 19:19:07 +0100, Heidy
<Heidy.ManwayNOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote:
[color=blue]
>Ivor Jones wrote:[color=green]
>> "Heidy" <Heidy.ManwayNOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:46599f77$0$16339$88260bb3@free.teranews.com
>>
>> [snip]
>>[color=darkred]
>>> Hi how com no ones mentioning Vonage.co.uk ?
>>> here good or bad experiences?[/color]
>>
>> Well for a start, they're expensive, have no free interconnection with
>> other providers and the equipment they supply is locked. Wouldn't touch
>> them.
>>
>> Ivor
>>
>>[/color]
>Damn it I fell for them hook line and sinker but everyones got to learn
>somewhere called the "learning curve" :)[/color]

What you on about Heidy take no notice of Ivor I have only been
subscribing to this forum for a short while and I am very quickly
growing to detest the sight of him .

<mymail@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:g0kj5318ened3qlrha10hsc6135t6eb59h@4ax.com[color=blue]
> On Sun, 27 May 2007 19:19:07 +0100, Heidy
> <Heidy.ManwayNOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote:
>[color=green]
> > Ivor Jones wrote:[color=darkred]
> > > "Heidy" <Heidy.ManwayNOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote in
> > > message
> > > news:46599f77$0$16339$88260bb3@free.teranews.com
> > >
> > > [snip]
> > >
> > > > Hi how com no ones mentioning Vonage.co.uk ?
> > > > here good or bad experiences?
> > >
> > > Well for a start, they're expensive, have no free
> > > interconnection with other providers and the
> > > equipment they supply is locked. Wouldn't touch them.
> > >
> > > Ivor
> > >
> > >[/color]
> > Damn it I fell for them hook line and sinker but
> > everyones got to learn somewhere called the "learning
> > curve" :)[/color]
>
> What you on about Heidy take no notice of Ivor I have
> only been subscribing to this forum for a short while and
> I am very quickly growing to detest the sight of him .[/color]

Yawn. Vonage is ok if you have the calling pattern to warrant the expense
and don't mind the limitations. Otherwise it's a waste of time.

And this *still* isn't a forum, Ron.

Ivor

On Sun, 27 May 2007 19:49:08 +0100, "Ivor Jones"
<ivor@despammed.invalid> wrote:

[color=blue]
>And this *still* isn't a forum, Ron.[/color]

Who is he Ivor you been on the booze again?.

On Sun, 27 May 2007 19:49:08 +0100, "Ivor Jones"
<ivor@despammed.invalid> wrote:
[color=blue]
>
>
><mymail@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:g0kj5318ened3qlrha10hsc6135t6eb59h@4ax.com[color=green]
>> On Sun, 27 May 2007 19:19:07 +0100, Heidy
>> <Heidy.ManwayNOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote:
>>[color=darkred]
>> > Ivor Jones wrote:
>> > > "Heidy" <Heidy.ManwayNOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote in
>> > > message
>> > > news:46599f77$0$16339$88260bb3@free.teranews.com
>> > >
>> > > [snip]
>> > >
>> > > > Hi how com no ones mentioning Vonage.co.uk ?
>> > > > here good or bad experiences?
>> > >
>> > > Well for a start, they're expensive, have no free
>> > > interconnection with other providers and the
>> > > equipment they supply is locked. Wouldn't touch them.
>> > >
>> > > Ivor
>> > >
>> > >
>> > Damn it I fell for them hook line and sinker but
>> > everyones got to learn somewhere called the "learning
>> > curve" :)[/color]
>>
>> What you on about Heidy take no notice of Ivor I have
>> only been subscribing to this forum for a short while and
>> I am very quickly growing to detest the sight of him .[/color]
>
>Yawn. Vonage is ok if you have the calling pattern to warrant the expense
>and don't mind the limitations. Otherwise it's a waste of time.
>
>And this *still* isn't a forum, Ron.
>
>Ivor
>[/color]
There you go gain Ivor seeing me round every corner if only you had
taken the trouble to check the headers you would have found that the
above message was posted via a BY account and my BY account as been
closed for around six weeks now .
Get your facts right before insinuating that I am posting stuff that I
am most certainly not , oh by the way Ivor have you reconciled
yourself to the fact that you ARE a European weather you like it or
not ? and this is also a FORUM weather you like it or not also .