The UK's Number One VoIP Resource
This is a discussion on cost savings voip /skype within the uk.telecom.voip forums, part of the Newsgroup Forums category; Does anyone have any stats on how much money they have saved by installing skype for a small or medium ...
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
Does anyone have any stats on how much money they have saved by
installing skype for a small or medium sized companies? There was an article in the guardian [url]http://observer.guardian.co.uk/cash/story/0,,2062580,00.html[/url] which stated that a home user had saved 60% - "We are probably making a 60 per cent saving on total phone bills,' This is a substantial saving and i am interested in knowing if anyone has had the same saving for businesses? |
|
|||
|
<Simon.Astbury@googlemail.com> wrote in message news:1177340836.707087.144800@l77g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...[color=blue] > Does anyone have any stats on how much money they have saved by > installing skype for a small or medium sized companies? > There was an article in the guardian > [url]http://observer.guardian.co.uk/cash/story/0,,2062580,00.html[/url] > which stated that a home user had saved 60% - "We are probably making > a 60 per cent saving on total phone bills,' > This is a substantial saving and i am interested in knowing if anyone > has had the same saving for businesses?[/color] I would not basis cheaper calls for business based on skype, for the following reasons 1- While costs are lower than BT, they are not super cheap, you may get better with a least cost routing supplier on existing system. 2- if your looking at a VOIP route there are others that are cheaper 3- With Skype you are looking at softphone use probably, users will get fed up of taking calls on one phone and making on different system 4- Its locked into one provider I like skype and it maybe useful for smaller one man band companies on the move, but it is limited, I do think having skype is usefull for incoming skype calls as a marketing "call us free" and showing you forward thinking, but not great as a means to save money. If you are looking VOIP for a business, a far better system would be to use SIP based providers and use an IP PBX, This would allow you to use a range of providers, and select via rules which one to use destination X. software like TrixBox, an example product (free and open source) allow much poweful business uses as well, such as CRM with click to call functions, automatic recording, voicemail and lots more. If you buy hardware you can connect your existing phone lines in,. I use trixbox myself as homeuser, I have I have a VOIP number in, with one provider, and use several other providers to make calls to europe at dirt cheapprices. If your looking for business voip probably the cheapest is voicetrading.com. The downside to VOIP is while you may save in call costs you may need to invest in better Internet connection to have lots of users using VOIP at once |
|
|||
|
RH wrote:[color=blue]
> 1- While costs are lower than BT, they are not super cheap, you may > get better with a least cost routing supplier on existing system. 2- > if your looking at a VOIP route there are others that are cheaper 3- > With Skype you are looking at softphone use probably, users will get > fed up of taking calls on one phone and making on different system 4- > Its locked into one provider[/color] 5- The call audio is compressed. Now, while the sound is nice, and most people don't notice anything wrong, it just isn't all there. I'm sure that on compressed calls, there are more questions. The listener will ask the speaker to clarify more often. To ask for something to be repeated, or for a word to be spelt out. Also, when I'm on a low bandwidth call, I usually find myself concentrating really hard to hear what people are saying. I know I get a warm ear because I'm holding the phone so close. A long G.723 call will give me a headache [1]. As you are paying your staff, if you pay 75p an hour for them to be able to make high quality phone calls, or 55p a minute to make crappy calls, I know which I'd choose. I said 55p. I know you can get unmetered calls on VoIP, but for the foreseeable future, most people that businesses call will be to fixed lined operators. And for internal voip, you have the cost of phones, internet connections, servers or a service provider, setting it all up .... But you can achieve cost savings using VoIP, but usually not on call charges. Maybe if your traffic is almost entirely internal. Examples, flexible routing of calls between 2 offices to make maximum use of available staff. Yes, this has been done for years in big call centres, but now can be done very cheaply for small organisations. People working from home. Realtime billing information - for instance, look at which calls your branch offices are making to see which members of staff are chatting to their friends, and which taking calls from customers. [1] - yes, I can usually tell which audio codec is being used on a call, just by listening to it. In some cases, I can say which ITSP the call is coming through. Tim |
|
|||
|
I suggest: do not use Skype for business use. Your calls go anywhere without quality control .... Use a good business voip provider like [url]www.XeloQ.com[/url] for this; I use it for years and they are very good. henry <Simon.Astbury@googlemail.com> wrote in message news:1177340836.707087.144800@l77g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...[color=blue] > Does anyone have any stats on how much money they have saved by > installing skype for a small or medium sized companies? > There was an article in the guardian > [url]http://observer.guardian.co.uk/cash/story/0,,2062580,00.html[/url] > which stated that a home user had saved 60% - "We are probably making > a 60 per cent saving on total phone bills,' > This is a substantial saving and i am interested in knowing if anyone > has had the same saving for businesses? >[/color] |
|
|||
|
RH wrote:[color=blue]
> <Simon.Astbury@googlemail.com> wrote in message > news:1177340836.707087.144800@l77g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...[color=green] >> Does anyone have any stats on how much money they have saved by >> installing skype for a small or medium sized companies? >> There was an article in the guardian >> [url]http://observer.guardian.co.uk/cash/story/0,,2062580,00.html[/url] >> which stated that a home user had saved 60% - "We are probably making >> a 60 per cent saving on total phone bills,' >> This is a substantial saving and i am interested in knowing if anyone >> has had the same saving for businesses?[/color] > > I would not basis cheaper calls for business based on skype, for the > following reasons > > 1- While costs are lower than BT, they are not super cheap, you may get > better with a least cost routing supplier on existing system. > 2- if your looking at a VOIP route there are others that are cheaper > 3- With Skype you are looking at softphone use probably, users will get fed > up of taking calls on one phone and making on different system > 4- Its locked into one provider > > I like skype and it maybe useful for smaller one man band companies on the > move, but it is limited, I do think having skype is usefull for incoming > skype calls > as a marketing "call us free" and showing you forward thinking, but not > great as a means to save money. > > If you are looking VOIP for a business, a far better system would be to use > SIP based providers and use an IP PBX, This would allow you to > use a range of providers, and select via rules which one to use destination > X. software like TrixBox, an example product (free and open source) allow > much poweful business uses as well, such as CRM with click to call > functions, automatic recording, voicemail and lots more. If you buy hardware > you can connect your existing phone lines in,. > > I use trixbox myself as homeuser, I have I have a VOIP number in, with one > provider, and use several other providers to make calls to europe at dirt > cheapprices. > If your looking for business voip probably the cheapest is voicetrading.com. > > The downside to VOIP is while you may save in call costs you may need to > invest in better Internet connection to have lots of users using VOIP at > once > > >[/color] I would have to agree that Skype is probably not best for business. ITSP's generally give you a better deal on call costs and ways to make calls such as using VoIP hardware. I personally would recommend SNOM phones to make calls using an ITSP as they offer great sound quality. They work just like a normal phone, but router calls over the internet. Many ITSP's also offer additional features for business, such as Virtual PBX which allow you to transfer calls between extensions etc etc. Also if you currently have numbers that people know, you can also port these numbers to the ITSP. Depending on your broadband speeds and the amount of traffic that goes across this it can be an issue. If you have a quick connection, you can normally make more than one call at at time. Remember its the upload speed that you need to look at when using ADSL, as this is slower that the download speed. It is also often wise to enable QoS on your router to give hight priority to your voice traffic. Also make the right choice of ISP, business packages normally offer better ratios to connection than standard packages. Many also offer traffic shaping that can also help the call quality (they give real-time protocols priority over non-real-time such as browsing the web). Also BT's 21C network is using SIP protocol, the same as many ITSP (Correct me if I'm wrong) so it is real the way forward. ----------------------- Ross Beer VoiceHost Support [url]www.voicehost.co.uk[/url] |
|
|||
|
[email]Simon.Astbury@googlemail.com[/email] wrote:[color=blue]
> Does anyone have any stats on how much money they have saved by > installing skype for a small or medium sized companies? > There was an article in the guardian [url]http://observer.guardian.co.uk/cash/story/0,,2062580,00.html[/url] > which stated that a home user had saved 60% - "We are probably making > a 60 per cent saving on total phone bills,' > This is a substantial saving and i am interested in knowing if anyone > has had the same saving for businesses?[/color] Almost certainly for us. As most of our business is e-tail rather than through our shop door, most of our phone calls are between 1 and 2 minutes to customers mobile numbers. With voip we pay around 6p per minute for mobiles and get all calls to landlines (which always total less than 5 hours/week)completely free. We also use the free minutes on the voip account for dialing from home and... have voip <-> voip from home to shop which again is free any time of day. Don't know about Skype. Might be a good tool for incoming calls especially if there are lots of overseas clients to be had, but VOIP is more versatile and cheaper for outgoing calls. But I would say 60% call saving is a fair figure for our own small business usage. It's also saved additional PSTN Lines and cut our need for more than 2 lines down to only requiring a single PSTN/BT line for back-up ADSL for when the cable connection goes down and outgoing Fax/card terminal connections. HTH Pete -- [url]http://www.gymratz.co.uk[/url] Gym Equipmrnt & Fitness Equipment specialists |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|