UKVoIPTalk.com

"{{{{{Welcome}}}}}" <bhx___spam@trapped___hotmail.co.uk>
wrote in message
news:Vt0Dh.4839$I46.2656@text.news.blueyonder.co.uk

[snip]
[color=blue]
> Revolutionary in which way? I can't see anything
> revolutionary.[/color]

He's revolutionary in the sheer level of spam created in the space of less
than 48 hours. Even Skype hasn't managed that.

Ivor

fa103 wrote:
[snip][color=blue]
> hence posting in this forum.[/color]

Cue Ivor with his magic dictionary.

"Paul Cupis" <paul@cupis.co.uk> wrote in message
news:45dcb7b5.0@entanet[color=blue]
> fa103 wrote:
> [snip][color=green]
> > hence posting in this forum.[/color]
>
> Cue Ivor with his magic dictionary.[/color]

Don't you start, it's bad enough with Dexter..!

(and this newsgroup still is not a forum...)

Ivor

Ivor Jones wrote:[color=blue]
> "Paul Cupis" <paul@cupis.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:45dcb7b5.0@entanet[color=green]
>> fa103 wrote:
>> [snip][color=darkred]
>>> hence posting in this forum.[/color]
>> Cue Ivor with his magic dictionary.[/color]
>
> Don't you start, it's bad enough with Dexter..!
>
> (and this newsgroup still is not a forum...)[/color]

Of course it is, for any reasonable definition of "forum". That you
cannot read an English dictionary does not change the facts.

"{{{{{Welcome}}}}}" <bhx___spam@trapped___hotmail.co.uk> wrote in
message news:Vt0Dh.4839$I46.2656@text.news.blueyonder.co.uk...[color=blue]
> fa103 wrote:[color=green]
>>
>> Dear Desk Rabbit,
>>
>> Your comments have not provoked or upset me in anyway. We deal with
>> users like yourself on a day to day basis, with over 100 paying
>> customers on launch our service is not meerly a "me too" VoIP
>> company,
>> we are a revolutionary product. Lastly, your comments have been very
>> much appreciated by myself and the team. We thought it important to
>> communicate with the user directly, hence posting in this forum. We
>> have recieved many suggestions some positive and some negative and
>> aim
>> to strengthen our foundations at Connexin.
>>
>> Hope you all the best
>>
>> F[/color]
>
> Revolutionary in which way? I can't see anything revolutionary.[/color]

Well it's got the same old spin.

On 19 Feb 2007 20:38:11 -0800, "fa103" <f.alamgir@connexin.co.uk>
wrote:
[color=blue]
>A brand new UK broadband service "Connexin" has been launched.[/color]


[url]http://www.connexin.co.uk/contactus.htm[/url]

Email & phone contact details only



Domain name: connexin.co.uk

Registrant's address:
The registrant is a non-trading individual who has opted to have
their address omitted from the WHOIS service


Why are connexin hiding their trading address from their customers?

On Feb 22, 9:29 am, MathMan <math...@scientist.com> wrote:[color=blue]
> On 19 Feb 2007 20:38:11 -0800, "fa103" <f.alam...@connexin.co.uk>
> wrote:
>[color=green]
> >A brand new UK broadband service "Connexin" has been launched.[/color]
>
> [url]http://www.connexin.co.uk/contactus.htm[/url]
>
> Email & phone contact details only
>
> Domain name: connexin.co.uk
>
> Registrant's address:
> The registrant is a non-trading individual who has opted to have
> their address omitted from the WHOIS service
>
> Why are connexin hiding their trading address from their customers?[/color]

That must be an error on their system. Our company Address is written
very clearly on the governments companies house website. As well as on
[url]www.connexin.co.uk[/url]

Regards,

F

On Feb 21, 7:47 pm, "Ivor Jones" <i...@despammed.invalid> wrote:[color=blue]
> "{{{{{Welcome}}}}}" <bhx___spam@trapped___hotmail.co.uk>
> wrote in messagenews:Vt0Dh.4839$I46.2656@text.news.blueyonder.co.uk
>
> [snip]
>[color=green]
> > Revolutionary in which way? I can't see anything
> > revolutionary.[/color]
>
> He's revolutionary in the sheer level of spam created in the space of less
> than 48 hours. Even Skype hasn't managed that.
>
> Ivor[/color]

Ivor,

Your definition of spam is way off. If anyone is spamming it is
yourself. This group was started to help educate those who wish to
learn more about VoIP. Its a discussion group. Your Useless messages
are the only spam in here. So unless you have a question, kindly stop
posting here.

Regards

F

You say that there is a choice of 2 Million numbers. Does that mean
that if I request a number a little further up the list of numbers for
a particular area code youy will be able to release it?

"fa103" <f.alamgir@connexin.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1172150036.686580.77080@p10g2000cwp.googlegroups.com

[snip]
[color=blue]
> Your definition of spam is way off. If anyone is spamming
> it is yourself. This group was started to help educate
> those who wish to learn more about VoIP. Its a discussion
> group. Your Useless messages are the only spam in here.
> So unless you have a question, kindly stop posting here.[/color]

I have a question - when are you going to stop spamming this group..? And
as for what this group was started for, I know *exactly* what it was
started for, because I started it. So don't tell me not to complain about
spammers, which you *ARE*. Now kindly go away.

Ivor