Ivor Jones wrote:[color=blue]
> "Desk Rabbit" <spam-me-not@example.com> wrote in message
> news:TcKdnXfsFuPQBPfbRVnygAA@pipex.net
>[color=green]
>>Ivor Jones wrote:
>>[color=darkred]
>>>"Desk Rabbit" <nospam@example.com> wrote in message
>>>news:7MKdnTYJhNbOPfTbnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@pipex.net
>>>
>>>
>>>>Ivor Jones wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>"Desk Rabbit" <nospam@example.com> wrote in message
>>>>>news:eN2dnYqj6uLf3vTbRVnyhAA@pipex.net
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Ivor Jones wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>[snip]
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>Referring to dictionaries will do you no good,
>>>>>>>it didn't work for the forum/newsgroup debacle
>>>>>>>and it won't work now.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I guess not because your definition of spam and
>>>>>>adverts are not the same as the rest of the
>>>>>>planet. Guess I should look in the "Ivor book of
>>>>>>words I mangled" Do you have the ISBN number?
>>>>>
>>>>>The whole rest of the planet..? Are you sure..?
>>>>>
>>>>>You have the option of killfiling me, why don't
>>>>>you..?
>>>>
>>>>Because then we would never resolve your skewed view.
>>>
>>>
>>>You never will anyway.[/color][/color]
>
>[color=green]
>>It is difficult when you are trying to have discussion
>>with someone and all they do is put their fingers in
>>their ears and sing "la la la"[/color]
>
>
> So don't reply. Easy. Problem gone.[/color]
Nope, problem stalled because you will stil come back and spew the same
old rubbish about spam again.