"Desk Rabbit" <spam-me-not@example.com> wrote in message
news:ro6dnRjjpqExZsDbRVnyhwA@pipex.net

[snip]
[color=blue]
> So the Ivor definition of newsgroup spam based on what
> you have said in this thread, is that it is spam provided
> it advertises something (or not), has a valid email
> address (or not), has a web site (or not) and may at some
> point in the distant future lead to some possibility that
> there might just be the faint hint of a posting with some
> sort of commercial bias related to the original posting.
> Brilliant Ivor, just plain brilliant.[/color]

Who said it was my definition..? Spam is spam is spam, whoever defines it.

Ivor