Ivor Jones wrote:[color=blue]
> "Paul Cupis" <paul@cupis.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:slrnf5e4tp.p8d.paul@challenger.my.home[color=green]
>> On 2007-05-24, Ivor Jones <ivor@despammed.invalid> wrote:[color=darkred]
>>> "Brian A" <no_spam_bca1000@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:j6oa535sum1fjgqvgb3lh9cl2fqqsdkikm@4ax.com
>>>> On Thu, 24 May 2007 10:21:38 +0100, "RH"
>>>> <rh@no-spicedham.exelsys.com> wrote:
>>>>> I hate spam as much as the next person, spam as far
>>>>> as I define it is ; 1 way blatent advertising.
>>>>> this message did not advertise any company or
>>>>> product and was a genuine question trying to bring
>>>>> up a worthwhile discussion.
>>>> I agree, it the post did not advertise anything, so it
>>>> might not be considerd as spam - unless you consider
>>>> it as market research spam.
>>> It's still spam. It was unsolicited and the poster
>>> doesn't give an email address that is valid,[/color]
>> So speaks <ivor@depsammed.invalid>. Nice troll, Ivor.[/color]
>
> Not at all. Change .invalid (the top level domain specifically intended
> for the purpose) to .com and mail will reach me.[/color]

And yet the email address you post from IS invalid. Just as the OPs. Not
only that, but neither of you provide instructions in your posts on who
to derive a valid email address.