Ivor Jones wrote:[color=blue]
> "Paul Cupis" <paul@cupis.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:slrnf5e52p.p8d.paul@challenger.my.home[color=green]
>> On 2007-05-25, Ivor Jones <ivor@despammed.invalid> wrote:[color=darkred]
>>> Indeed. But a company that uses a munged address and
>>> doesn't provide a website where you can check out their
>>> products is somewhat suspicious to my mind.[/color]
>> But they are not advertising anything nor are they
>> inviting people to contact them directly. They (whoever
>> they are) are asking a simple question on
>> uk.telecom.voip, a discussion group, probably to illicit
>> discussion regarding VoIP in the UK.[/color]
>
> Right. The part of your sentence above "whoever they are" says it all to
> me. If they were a reputable organisation they wouldn't hide.[/color]

So because they have not give you proof of identity in some form, they
must be spammers? Even though it is completely irrelevant for their post?