"Paul Cupis" <paul@cupis.co.uk> wrote in message
news:slrnf5e4tp.p8d.paul@challenger.my.home[color=blue]
> On 2007-05-24, Ivor Jones <ivor@despammed.invalid> wrote:[color=green]
> > "Brian A" <no_spam_bca1000@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:j6oa535sum1fjgqvgb3lh9cl2fqqsdkikm@4ax.com[color=darkred]
> > > On Thu, 24 May 2007 10:21:38 +0100, "RH"
> > > <rh@no-spicedham.exelsys.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I hate spam as much as the next person, spam as far
> > > > as I define it is ; 1 way blatent advertising.
> > > > this message did not advertise any company or
> > > > product and was a genuine question trying to bring
> > > > up a worthwhile discussion.
> > >
> > > I agree, it the post did not advertise anything, so it
> > > might not be considerd as spam - unless you consider
> > > it as market research spam.[/color]
> >
> > It's still spam. It was unsolicited and the poster
> > doesn't give an email address that is valid,[/color]
>
> So speaks <ivor@depsammed.invalid>. Nice troll, Ivor.[/color]

Not at all. Change .invalid (the top level domain specifically intended
for the purpose) to .com and mail will reach me.

Ivor