On 2007-05-25, Ivor Jones <ivor@despammed.invalid> wrote:[color=blue]
>
>
> "Paul Cupis" <paul@cupis.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:f356ob$1v84$3@energise.enta.net[color=green]
>> Ivor Jones wrote:[color=darkred]
>> > "Infant Newbie" <infant@newbie.new> wrote in message
>> > news:f32j6p$a5h$1@news.freedom2surf.net
>> > > "Ivor Jones" <ivor@despammed.invalid> wrote in message
>> > > news:5bjb8hF2srgukU1@mid.individual.net...
>> > > > "Infant Newbie" <infant@newbie.new> wrote in message
>> > > > news:f305k2$fij$1@news.freedom2surf.net
>> > > > > We will launch a new VOIP service soon. We are
>> > > > > sounding out u guys n gals in this newsgroup!
>> > > > > Tell me what you would like from our service
>> > > > No spam.
>> > > >
>> > > What makes this spam?
>> >
>> > It's unsolicited. That's the definition of spam.[/color]
>>
>> No it's not.[/color]
>
> Unsolicited Commercial Email.[/color]

Pick ONE definition, please.
[color=blue]
> It was certainly unsolicited.[/color]

Agreed.
[color=blue]
> It may not have been commercial, but it looked like it to me.[/color]

It wasn't commercial, and isn't commercial. You jumped the gun and
didn't read the original post. An apology from you to the OP would be
nice, but I don't expect we'll see one. Nor do I expect you to admit
that you are wrong in this case.
[color=blue]
> Email, well a newsgroup posting may not be email, but it's close
> enough.[/color]

<groundless argument>
Email is not a newsgroup. Nowhere on the [url]www.usenet.org.uk[/url] does it say
the word email, therefore you may not refer to it as email EVER.
</groundless argument>