Ivor Jones wrote:[color=blue]
> "Brian A" <no_spam_bca1000@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:j6oa535sum1fjgqvgb3lh9cl2fqqsdkikm@4ax.com[color=green]
>> On Thu, 24 May 2007 10:21:38 +0100, "RH"
>> <rh@no-spicedham.exelsys.com> wrote:
>>[color=darkred]
>>> "Ivor Jones" <ivor@despammed.invalid> wrote in message
>>> news:5bjb8hF2srgukU1@mid.individual.net...
>>>> "Infant Newbie" <infant@newbie.new> wrote in message
>>>> news:f305k2$fij$1@news.freedom2surf.net
>>>>> We will launch a new VOIP service soon. We are
>>>>> sounding out u guys n gals in this newsgroup! Tell
>>>>> me what you would like from our service
>>>> No spam.
>>> I hate spam as much as the next person, spam as far as
>>> I define it is ; 1 way blatent advertising.
>>> this message did not advertise any company or product
>>> and was a genuine question trying to bring up a
>>> worthwhile discussion.[/color]
>> I agree, it the post did not advertise anything, so it
>> might not be considerd as spam - unless you consider it
>> as market research spam.[/color]
>
> It's still spam. It was unsolicited and the poster doesn't give an email
> address that is valid, nor a website to check out.[/color]

Make up your mind. If they had posted a web site you'd be complaining it
was spam now you are complaining its spam because they didn't post a web
site! FFS!