On Thu, 24 May 2007 10:21:38 +0100, "RH" <rh@no-spicedham.exelsys.com>
wrote:
[color=blue]
>
>"Ivor Jones" <ivor@despammed.invalid> wrote in message
>news:5bjb8hF2srgukU1@mid.individual.net...[color=green]
>> "Infant Newbie" <infant@newbie.new> wrote in message
>> news:f305k2$fij$1@news.freedom2surf.net[color=darkred]
>>> We will launch a new VOIP service soon. We are sounding
>>> out u guys n gals in this newsgroup! Tell me what you
>>> would like from our service[/color]
>>
>> No spam.[/color]
>
>I hate spam as much as the next person, spam as far as I define it is ; 1
>way blatent advertising.
>this message did not advertise any company or product and was a genuine
>question trying to bring up a worthwhile discussion.[/color]
I agree, it the post did not advertise anything, so it might not be
considerd as spam - unless you consider it as market research spam.
I am going to give it the botd.

O.K., I was hoping I wouildn't be the first here ...
1. Obvious stuff like reliability and good quality audio.
2. Good prices including a flat rate to landlines like voip.co.uk and
vyke.co.uk. Decent mobile rates.
3. Good voicemail facility.
4. MUST work with Voxalot.
5. Usual inclusive 'network services' (i.e. 1471 etc.) additions.
6. Inclusive geo incoming number.

Now, the above should create some comment... :-)



Remove 'no_spam_' from email address.