On Fri, 18 May 2007 19:06:26 GMT, "harrogate3" <nospam3@ntlworld.com>
mused:
[color=blue]
>
>"LVMarc" <LVMarc@att.net> wrote in message
>news:ism3i.105941$Fk2.96782@newsfe08.phx...[color=green]
>> The reliance on USB and computer support of an adapter for voip pstn
>> combining. uses more energy than the :
>> cost of the adapter
>> than the amount you can save on your voip calling plan!
>>
>> a usb port ad cpu use >420 watts.. fugre out that you pay $0.016 per[/color]
>KWH[color=green]
>> you pay over one e daollr per day in power more in commercial[/color]
>setting[color=green]
>> where peak power charges are incurred.
>>
>> A review suggests how much power is used here.............
>>
>>[/color]
>[url]http://reviews.ebay.com/Billions-energy-savings-avoid-USB-powered-VOIP-adapter_W0QQugidZ10000000003599864[/url][color=green]
>>
>>
>> A non usb pstn voip pstn adapter is located here
>>
>>[/color]
>[url]http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&ih=020&sspagename=STRK%3AMESE%3AIT&viewitem=&item=300111295431&rd=1&rd=1[/url][color=green]
>>
>> a video of the operation of the Combine-a-line- (non usb) adapter is
>> here....
>>
>> View here and now.....[url]http://www.youtube.com/v/R0aGKJQc7rc[/url]
>>
>>
>> Thanks for viewing
>>
>> Marc
>>[/color]
>
>Please, why are we talking USD ona UK newsgroup?
>[/color]
Does spam regard too many of the etiquettes of posting?

Even more annoying than spam though, is people who reply to it when
they have inferior spam filters.
--
Regards,
Stuart.