In message <0299v2pcf50jdkadvmorf3bs5lr2lf8g0v@4ax.com>
[email]clavox@btinternet.com[/email] wrote:
[color=blue]
> On Sun, 11 Mar 2007 23:12:56 -0000, "Ivor Jones"
> <ivor@despammed.invalid> wrote:
>
>[color=green]
> >Emphasis on the word *was* - yes, it *was* - in my personal experience it
> >*isn't* NOW. Don't fall into Ron's trap of slagging off someone for what
> >they *used* to be like.[/color]
> AGAIN I say a leopard cannot change its spots so why give them or any
> other provider for that matter a second chance[/color]

Sipgate isn't a leopard. Your analogy is false and worthless, even
if it is an old saying.

Let's spell it out for you again. Several people, including myself,
have agreed that Sipgate did in the past provide a substandard
service - but that Sipgate nowadays provides a good service.

Sipgate has changed.

Dave