Re: Voip stunt
"Nigel" <dgfh@ndhs.net> wrote in message
news:enadet$7vj$1@news.datemas.de...[color=blue]
> Hi . happy New year.
>
> Thanks for all your reply. I do know about the ATA devices but I need a
> new
> phone any way, so I thought a new cordless usb phone would work out
> cheaper.
>
>
>
> [url]http://tinyurl.com/yfkox8[/url] - will this work with Voip stunt??
>
>
> thanks.
>
> Nigel[/color]
Pretty sure this would not be compatible with VOIPStunt. You might be able
to get basic audio working on it with something like an X-Lite soft phone
but I am not at all sure that the additional functionality such as dialling
from the handset, Caller display, etc would work.
Why not a cheap DECT handset such as [url]http://tinyurl.com/ylpsvq[/url] and an ATA
such as [url]http://tinyurl.com/ydj27q?[/url]
[url]http://tinyurl.com/yhnro8[/url] also looks interesting, but I don't have any
experience of this and you will need a free ethernet port somewhere.
Although you won't find many people on this group (including myself) that
rate Skype as a replacement telephone service, if you are insistent that it
has to be a cordless USB phone, and are happy to accept that the computer
must be switched on to make a call, then Skype is the logical solution. I
won't repeat various historical threads about the other disadvantages of
Skype.
You could also go for a WiFi phone, but these are still far too expensive
and do not look sexy either IMHO.
|