Brian wrote:
[color=blue]
> On 2006-11-09, alexd <look@my.sig> wrote:[/color]
[color=blue][color=green]
>> You snipped this:[/color][/color]
[color=blue][color=green][color=darkred]
>>>> It has a sip server address of sip.btsip.bt.net[/color][/color]
>
> I cannot find that sentence on that page. I expect you will help me out.[/color]

Message-ID: <q116l2930jk0llgv9e23di4l45femdojda@4ax.com>, third from last
line.
[color=blue]
> sip.btsip.bt.net is there as an outbound proxy.[/color]

Ah OK - so definitely no use as an inbound one then? Has anyone tried from
outside of BT's network?
[color=blue][color=green]
>> so:
>>
>> $ host sip.btsip.bt.net
>> sip.btsip.bt.net has address 81.144.106.8[/color][/color]
[color=blue]
> Does that make 44560*******@sip.btsip.bt.com a more likely URI?[/color]

Not 100% certain about the guidelines for a SIP URI, but I would have
thought that the bit after the @ would have to resolve in order for it to
be valid, so .net is more likely than .com.

Sometimes SIP URIs make use of DNS SRV records, so that one can call
[email]foo@bar.com[/email] when it's really [email]foo@sip.bar.com[/email] [at least I think that's how
it works].

--
<http://ale.cx/> (AIM:troffasky) (UnSoEsNpEaTm@ale.cx)
19:05:09 up 17 days, 2:51, 3 users, load average: 3.32, 3.13, 3.10
This is my BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOMSTICK