PhilT wrote:[color=blue]
> Ivor Jones wrote:[color=green]
>> "PhilT" <newsnet@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:1157994927.745878.126390@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com
>>[color=darkred]
>>> the variability of the service is too great for robust
>>> testing.[/color]
>> How so..? It works fine here and has done almost 100% since the server
>> upgrades in April.[/color]
>
> "almost 100%" may be the problem, I am looking for something for
> "robust testing". You say yourself that you don't make many calls, so
> maybe your sample is statistically challenged.
>[/color]
Even Gradwell doesn't work 100% of the time. (or BT for that matter).