Re: ATA to replace SPA-3000?
Martin Johnson schreef:[color=blue]
> Christian wrote:[color=green][color=darkred]
>>> My solution will be to get a Siemens C475IP or maybe the similar
>>> SNOM M3.[/color]
>>
>> To be honest, that is exactly what I did (an S450IP in my case). The
>> advantage of a real VOIP-phone rather than an ATA is that the sent and
>> received signal never meet each other on a single line. The only echo
>> will be caused acoustically in the handset. So the chance of echo on
>> the far end is reduced quite a lot. I never had any complaints about
>> echo anymore (I did have some with my SPA3000, although not often).[/color]
>
> I have a local PSTN number on my Gradwell VOIP service, so that PSTN
> callers in my own town don't need to dial an area code to call me.
>
> After turning down the SPA3000 gain settings a while back, I _think_ I
> only now get complaints about echo from callers in my own town, as if
> BT's audio gain was higher for such callers. Is it possible that the
> audio gain in the BT network is routing-dependent, or is it more likely
> to just be coincidence?
>
> - Martin.[/color]
You turning down the audio gain, makes BT turning it up ?
isn't there a call-smart setting possible in your situation ?
--
Bedankt, Thanks,
The Fug.
VoIP/SIP switched by: [url]www.mysipswitch.com[/url]
(A free service sponsored by [url]www.blueface.ie[/url])
|