In article <3eSdnXUiGfgUJYrVnZ2dnUVZ8qOknZ2d@plusnet>,
Martin² <never@give.one> wrote:[color=blue]
>Thanks Gordon.
>I have found that setting the up the QoS on my Draytek 2600VG router made
>significant difference to my VoIP calls,[/color]

I've used 2600's in the past with good results. However they seem to have
bugs with NAT handling. Not sure if I've found a good replacement for
them yet though - currently looking at Zyxels...
[color=blue]
>but then there are two other users unpredictably using the BB.[/color]

The QoS (traffic shaping) will help with uploads, but not do much for
downloads.
[color=blue]
>Now, because persistent problems on the line, we have switched to 2WIRE
>(BT1801HG) router which can cope with the dodgy line and has better (400mW
>?) wireless performance, but no VoIP or QoS.[/color]

You could put a 2nd router (one with 2 ethernet interfaces) after the
2wire router, but it them becomes messy..
[color=blue]
>I have acquired a Senao WiFi phone, but it doesn't work very well (see other
>post).
>I am thus tempted by the Siemens, but worried about call quality.[/color]

I'm not a fan of Wi-Fi phones, but saying that, I have a nokia E90 and
it's been working very well - however my desk is only a few metres away
from the base station and the Wi-Fi network is very lightly loaded.

The coverage from the Siemens units has been very good - especially if
you mount their base stations on a suitable wall.

Gordon