Re: Voipraider.com ip address
On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 18:25:51 +0100, Jono <nothanks@blueyonder.invalid>
wrote:
[color=blue]
>on 14/04/2008, Brian A supposed :[color=green]
>> On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 08:03:08 -0700 (PDT), hammond
>> <stephen.hammond@gmail.com> wrote:
>>[color=darkred]
>>> All my voipraider.com calls are being charged whilst voipcheap.com
>>> calls are not. I think this maybe because I have a dynamic IP address.
>>> How do I get round this can I use Voxalot or something, how long will
>>> I need the same IP address for, for the calls to be free ?[/color]
>> I use Voxalot for justVoip and it works fine. The possibility of the
>> IP changing is the reason I am not making any justVoip calls direct
>> from my ATA.
>> I put the question, re what happened if the IP changed etc., in a post
>> recently, and no one appeared to have an answer. You might be the
>> guinea pig here. I guess that the 7 day thing might have a bearing on
>> it. You might have to miss out on 1 day or even 7 - who can tell! I
>> would start by using voxalot and waiting one day before you make any
>> calls. Make one call on one day and, if you get charged, try again the
>> following day.
>>[/color]
>
>Their "per unique IP address" rule is to stop call centres using the
>service with a single tenner's credit; not to make dynamic IP
>addresses cost more to use......
>[/color]
I agree that this was introduced to stop fraud but it is a case of
what is the 'fall out' for the ordinary honest user. They actually say
"per unique IP address" on JustVoip. An IP address is 'unique' so I
think they have chosen the wrong word here. I think they mean per
single, static IP address - and therein lies the problem. Just last
week I set up an SPA-3102 for some relations. I did consider setting
up the ATA to make calls directly but I couldn't take the risk with
someone else's set up - thus I chose to use Voxalot because I know
that it will work consistently. As, currently, they only want to make
outgoing calls there was no extra cost involved. The OP is now
experiencing what I feared might happen.
---
Remove 'no_spam_' from email address.
---
|