Re: voipcheap.co.uk vs voipchap.com
"Ian Pawson" <ian@ipawson.com> wrote in message
news:fk8vuc$9i0$1@registered.motzarella.org...[color=blue]
>I am currently using the .co.uk service as they provided free sms texts,
> but charged 1p per min for uk landline calls wheresas the .com chaged
> for texts but calls were free (up to 300 min per week).Now I notice that
> they have now started charging 3p for texts, so the .com service is
> cheaper overall.
> How come the same company has such different rates?[/color]
Hi,
I think the idea is, across countless (at least 15+), "same company" brands,
to have multiple combinations of free and paid for destinations and
services, to best cover all angles and make most revenue from a given
customer base (as well as offering some other ancillary benefits - marketing
performance evaluation, r&d, testing and rolling out of new and different
services, etc.).
Best wishes,
News Reader
|